^Masters, Brian (1993). The Shrine of Jeffrey Dahmer. London, England: Hodder & Stoughton. ISBN 978-0-340-59194-9.Masters, Brian (1993). The Shrine of Jeffrey Dahmer. London, England: Hodder & Stoughton. ISBN 978-0-340-59194-9.
^Masters, Brian (1993). The Shrine of Jeffrey Dahmer. London, England: Hodder & Stoughton. ISBN 978-0-340-59194-9.
^Maxwell v. State [2000], Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals (United States).
^"Man held in slaying of couple". Sarasota Herald-Tribune. April 18, 1997.
^"36-year-old Arcadia man is arrested in connection with couple's deaths". Sarasota Herald-Tribune. April 18, 1997.
Hi, XRozuRozu. Thanks for your message. Maybe it is just me, but "when being the victim of the act of murder" does not gel well with me (especially the snippet "being the victim" as it almost radiates a theatrical impression). Bear in mind I'm a Limey, or redcoat, so "it's a good job" people point these things out. :) How about "subjected to the act of murder"?--Kieronoldham (talk) 23:15, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I meant that changing it to "when the recipient of the act of murder" does not make it a complete sentence. I think you meant "being the recipient"?