User talk:KatVanHuis

Disambiguation link notification for April 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Constructivist architecture, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Stirling. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:51, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Restaurant tram moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Restaurant tram, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 07:50, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Restaurant tram

Hello, KatVanHuis. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Restaurant tram, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:01, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Restaurant tram has been accepted

Restaurant tram, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 18:05, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-metro moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Semi-metro, is not suitable as written to remain published. While it appears to be notable, it needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. There are large sections which are wholly uncited. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. I did this rather than removing the uncited material in the article, which I felt would be more disruptive. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to ask on my talk page. When you have the required sourcing (and every assertion needs a source), and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Or feel free to ping me to take another look.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:32, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Semi-metro has been accepted

Semi-metro, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 18:48, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi KatVanHuis. Thank you for your work on Tram with suspended articulation. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice work. The lead could benefit from being more explanatory. The first sentence is unclear other than saying what it is unlike. Happy editing!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 15:53, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting an assessment of an article

Hi there! I noticed you've assessed articles for the Trains WikiProject before, so I'd like to request an assessment of an article into which I've put a lot of work: 2999 Lady of Legend. I'd really appreciate an article assessment, as it was rated start class when it was first created and the article has come a long way since then. Thank you for your time, and no worries if this is not possible. Thanks! MelonLost (talk) 12:38, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

March 2025

Your recent editing history at Link light rail shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Sounder Bruce 00:56, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello SounderBruce, I have to strongly disagree here as anyone can see that I didn't start with reverting and anyone can see that I have started a dialogue on March 9th, and also that as of yet my last reply on March 12th has remained unanswered. KatVanHuis (talk) 07:17, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thank you so much for your help with 2999 Lady of Legend I really appreciate your feedback and cannot thank you enough for your help. MelonLost (talk) 10:11, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome. I think the collaboration went really smooth, and I'm also content with the result: a much better flow of the article which makes it easier to read. KatVanHuis (talk) 10:27, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Light train

The article Light train has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article topic appears to be a neologism and is not used in the sense of the article by any sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sub31k (talk) 03:52, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Light train for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Light train is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Light train until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Sub31k (talk) 15:20, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Enough

It's one thing for you to make your own walled garden with nonsense terms like "semi-metro" or "pre-metro", but you do NOT have the right to hijack and disrupt other articles to promote your pet cause. You've been edit warring to add your fake terms into Link light rail and Muni Metro, among many other articles; you blatantly violated consensus to restore The Hague Semi-metro against a closed discussion with unambiguous consensus to merge, and now you're targeting Passenger train too. You've gone too far. If you do not stop your one editor crusade against all consensus, I will be taking you to ANI so your edit warring, WP:IDHT behavior, POV pushing, and sealioning can be addressed by the larger community. Wikipedia operates by consensus. There was clear consensus that the light train article should be deleted. You do not get to simply copy and paste it into another article without even the slightest attempt to actually integrate it with the rest of the article. That is hijacking, which is a blockable offense. There was a clear consensus in multiple places that your fake terms should not be included in the articles, as you are engaging in original research to get your pet terms included in articles where no sources have made that connection. I can list more examples of your poor (if not outright sanctionable) conduct in the past few months if this isn't enough for you. All of this needs to stop. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 21:58, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Trainsandotherthings, this is a lot all at once and that's alright. But threatening is not alright. Everyone is equal at Wikipedia. I'm always explaining my additions and (given enough time) I always reply when other editors share their concerns.

For your main point: I did trim down and made some text adjustments before adding the "light-weight" topic to Passenger train.

Additionally:

If "semi-metro" or "pre-metro" were nonsense terms, they would not appear in secondary sources.
The discussion at "The Hague Semi-metro" was closed by the same account as the account that started the discussion. This account did this without even one single reply to my concerns. How is that even close to reaching a proper consensus?

KatVanHuis (talk) 06:40, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]