User talk:Justlettersandnumbers

  User page     Talk page     Older talk     Sandbox     Toolbox     References     Articles created     CSD log  

Editing the page

Hi - I'm am employee at Berkeley, and I'm trying to make sure this webpage remains up to date. I have no idea who wrote it originally or how old the copy is. I totally understand removing promotional language—I can keep the tone more neutral going forward. But a lot of the things that I updated for accuracy have been deleted.

The faculty number reference is from 2011...it's no longer correct. Numbers change every school year. Same with the average class size and student/teacher ratio. There's a missing accreditation. In the intro graph, eight buildings and 1200 students is wrong. Kindergarten to twelfth grade is wrong (we start in pre-k).

Can you please help me understand why you deleted the work I did yesterday and replaced it with old and inaccurate info? How can I make updates in a way that will be approved? Thank you for any guidance. This is my first time editing Wikipedia. Janebianchi (talk) 18:15, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Hi, Janebianchi, and welcome to Wikipedia! – this is your first edit here. I'll leave you some advice on your talk-page on how to handle paid-editor disclosure and how to stay within our conflict-of-interst guidelines. Regards, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 18:35, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Murillo de Aragão

Hello there! My name is Bruno Vieira, from Brazil. I wrote an article about Murillo de Aragão, and the text was removed by you under the argument that it infringed copywrite. However, I have the permission of the owner to use the information of the website I used. How can I make this work? Can you help me? Bruno Furtado Vieira (talk) 11:39, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

• 22:02, 12 January 2025 Justlettersandnumbers talk contribs deleted page Draft talk:Murillo de Aragão (G8: Talk page of deleted page "Draft:Murillo de Aragão") Tag: Twinkle (thank)

Bruno Furtado Vieira (talk) 11:41, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

Hi, Bruno Furtado Vieira! I've left a (pre-packaged) message about copyright on your talk-page. In this case, the holder of the copyright of the text should follow the instructions here. Please be aware that text from external websites is hardly ever found suitable for inclusion in this project, so it may be more productive to simply write new text of your own.

It seems that you may have some personal or professional connection to this person; please read this guidance, and make a point of mentioning your conflict of interest whenever making any edit relating to him (including talk-page discussions). Thank you, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 16:42, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

Undeletion request

Could you please undelete Ax and the Hatchetmen? I think it could be notable. Thanks, C F A 21:00, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Hi, CFA! No problem, please see here. Good luck with it! Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:11, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Deletion of my article

Hello! Im Draco,

I recently made an article about Ioannis (Johnny) Draculis, his early life, his carrier and his projects because he is one of the youngest ever worked with big artists in the music industry. The page got deleted by you due to advertising but it wasnt intended at all. Can you get it back up and maybe change the form of the info so it wont seem to attend advertising? The point wasnt to advertise Johnny but to make people notice his work & ethic. Thank you!

Draco DracoYRN (talk) 18:33, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

No, I'm sorry, DracoYRN, that page was a blatant advertisement and I'm not prepared to restore it. If you want to try again, I suggest this: 1. read the notice I'll leave on your talk about creating autobiographies; 2. find a good number of independent reliable sources that discuss you in detail (if there aren't any, stop here); and 3. then and only then, write plain factual text including only material directly supported by your sources. Good luck! Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 18:54, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

The notice about autobiographies is already on your talk-page. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 18:56, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Alright! Thank you for your tips. Im new in Wikipedia and i really need people to guide me on my first steps. Again, nothing from this was intentional. I wasnt sure how to make the biography right for the terms of Wikipedia. I appreciate you for your help and i will make sure to check everything before i re-write any article here! DracoYRN (talk) 19:04, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Deletion of my article

Hello, I noticed that the page "User:Boskovicdd/sandbox" was deleted on 20 January 2025 under G11 (Unambiguous advertising or promotion). I’m reaching out to understand more about the reason for this deletion. I wrote an article about a man that has contributed a lot in blockchain technology and science. I would like to know what is considered advertising, could I continue editing on the page that i already wrote with some changes, and how do i prevent this from happening again. Thank you for your time and help! Best regards, Boskovicdd (talk) 15:35, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Hi, Boskovicdd! As you already know, I deleted User:Boskovicdd/sandbox as 'unambiguous advertising or promotion', there's little to add to that – and as such, I'm not prepared to restore it. Wikipedia articles are written in a neutral or even boring tone; they do not contain material such as "His pioneering contributions have significantly influenced areas such as industrial automation ..." or "Known for his leadership in academia ..." (please note that this person has an h-index of 11 according to Scopus). The page was also without any citations and had no independent reliable sources whatsoever. Our notability criteria for academics are here. If you want to try again, may I suggest that you follow the steps laid out in my reply to DracoYRN in the section immediately above this (timestamped 18:54, 20 January 2025)? May I also remind you that creating autobiographies is strongly discouraged in this project? Good luck! Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 16:37, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

-ly hyphens

Hi Justlettersandnumbers, You reverted someone's correct edit with this edit. Please see the fourth point in Section 3 ("Avoid using a hyphen after a standard -ly adverb") of the MOS. I would normally just change this and not comment, but you're an admin? Regards, Ericoides (talk) 15:22, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

Well, you had me puzzled for a moment, Ericoides, but I now see that that edit was eight years ago, and also had a clear edit summary, "restore correctly-formed compound adjective". This is one of the more idiotic laws of the MOS police, right up there with not being "allowed" to use USA as an abbreviation for the name of that country – both go directly against the normal usage in the kind of English I speak (the English kind). Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 17:15, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

Not really. A hyphen is included in a compound to avoid ambiguity. "A well known man" is ambiguous because it's unclear if it denotes a man who's well known, or a known man who's well. So we have the hyphen, making "a well-known man" mean a man who's well known. But in the case of adverbial -ly compounds, there can be no ambiguity. "A correctly formed phrase" is absolutely fine without a hyphen, as "a formed phrase" that's also "correctly" makes no sense. This rule is observed by all major English-language book publishers (I've worked in the industry for 30 years), so your "police" and "normal usage" seem misplaced here! Oddly, the Guardian insist on using ly- hyphens, but they also use "second world war", so what do they know? Regards, Ericoides (talk) 17:36, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

As I said, that's the variety of English I speak (and taught for forty years). And yes, it's the Second World War – my grandfather wrote a book on it. Regards, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 17:59, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

I'm glad we agree on "Second World War", but the hyphen rule is about correctly written rather than elegantly spoken English. That all UK/US publishers observe this omission of the -ly hyphen, combined with the coherent rationale behind it, might give one pause for thought, but I guess entrenched habits (and thank you for your forty years' service) die hard. I know I find it almost impossible to give up eating cheese. Regards and farewell, Ericoides (talk) 18:14, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

Why did you delete my father's obituary?

Why are deleting pages that you have nothing to do with? You've just deleted my father's obituary - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alister_Jason_Borthwick - citing that we linked it to an article in our local press. You could have deleted the link if for some reason it breaks Wikipedia rules, but to delete the whole obituary is disgusting! Why do you have the right to delete people from history, when you don't know them, haven't spent any time asking about them, and couldn't be bothered to contact the creator of the page, ie me. I specifically requested you not to delete the page when it was marked, and you completely ignored it. You shouldn't be allowed any access on this system, as you clearly don't wield your power with any care or thought! Earthlyideas (talk) 11:53, 1 February 2025 (UTC)

I will be reporting you to the Wikipedia.

Well, hi, Earthlyideas! If you look at this page (as I assume you've already done?), you'll see that I deleted it as "G12: Unambiguous copyright infringement of https://www.edp24.co.uk/news/20767945.everyone-enjoying-legacy-hard-work---tributes-pour-norfolks-goose-man/". That's because the page was a word-for-word copy of an obituary by Donna-Louise Bishop from the Eastern Daily Press, taken from a web-page clearly marked "© 2001-2025. Newsquest Media Group Ltd". I'll leave a pre-written message on your talk about this in a moment, but for now: Wikipedia does not permit copyright violations and its copyright policy is strictly enforced. Unfortunately I have found similar problems – going back to 2007 – in William Jason Maxwell Borthwick and have blanked that and listed it at this board for investigation and clean-up.

You appear to be under some misapprehension as to what this project is: it is an encyclopaedia, with articles on topics that editors agree to be sufficiently notable to merit inclusion. It is not a place to post an obituary or write personal family histories, and it is most emphatically not the place to promote your business activities. Please read this on how to go about achieving changes to articles on any friends or family who may happen have one, and this on the obligatory disclosures to be made before making any edit relating to a business activity from which you receive or hope to receive financial benefit of any kind. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 17:57, 1 February 2025 (UTC)

Gotta say, “I will be reporting you to the Wikipedia” is kind of an all timer. Just great stuff. 19h00s (talk) 18:49, 1 February 2025 (UTC)

Information about a deleted page

Hey User:Justlettersandnumbers, I hope you're having a great day!

I'm reaching out in reference to the ongoing discussion on Wikimedia Commons about this file on the Commons and its corresponding deletion request. I see you're also fairly active on Commons, but I thought it might be better to discuss this here, as I’m seeking clarification on a deleted user page, as indicated by the title of my message.

You deleted this page under the rationale G11. Could you please clarify what kind of advertising was present on the page? Was it entirely or partially related to the image in question, or was there no image at all? As a non-administrator, I can only confirm that the image was present on User:Manoj D25/sandbox (the user’s old name's sandbox), and I would appreciate it if you could check the sandbox page too.

It would be really helpful if you could look into this, as I took quite a harsh stand on the deletion request, and I want to ensure I’ve done everything correctly.

Thanks in advance for your help! --Contributor2020^{Talk to me here!} 14:35, 3 February 2025 (UTC)

Hi, Contributor2020, how are you? The advertising in User:Shanthan was of the blatant or indeed vomit-inducing kind; there was a selfie-type image in the page, I don't know if that was the same as this on Commons, which I can't see. I can't see any connection in any of this to the Sandisk image you mention. Does this answer the question? Regards, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 12:29, 4 February 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for the information! --Contributor2020^{Talk to me here!} 12:54, 4 February 2025 (UTC)

Discussion at User talk:331dot § File:Output-onlinepngtools-2.png

 You are invited to join the discussion at User talk:331dot § File:Output-onlinepngtools-2.png. -- Marchjuly (talk) 11:14, 4 February 2025 (UTC)

Hi Justlettersandnumbers. You deleted HellasCar per G7, but the file being used in the article is still around. Perhaps you could help figure out how to best deal with it. -- Marchjuly (talk) 11:16, 4 February 2025 (UTC)

Yes indeed, Marchjuly, now done. I tend not to worry about dealing with any local non-free images in a deleted page, as they seem just to fade away in due course. I do try to remember to nominate inappropriate images uploaded to Commons for deletion, though. Regards, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:37, 4 February 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for taking a look at this. -- Marchjuly (talk) 11:39, 4 February 2025 (UTC)

g7

Hi, can you delete this as an AFD delete outcome instead of G7? Deleting it as G7 instead of a proper AFD outcome makes it possible to game the system by making it refundable, and it prevents future G4 speedy deletions (as recently happened with this, G7 deletion during an AFD instead of an AFD delete outcome prevented a G4 recently) and it basically ignores the efforts of all those AFD participants with deletion votes and rationale by making it possible to refund and also preventing future G4s. There was a dicussion about this here, and as a result of that discussion WP:G7 was modified and "If an author requests deletion of a page currently undergoing a deletion discussion, the closing admin may interpret that request as agreement with the deletion rationale" text was added to address this situation. Considering this user is trying to insert himself to Wikipedia on multiple wikis for a year, he will likely re-create it again and it should be possible to G4 speedy it when that happens, but this outcome prevents a future G4, and that doesn't make sense when a lot of people voted delete on that AFD. Tehonk (talk) 20:41, 6 February 2025 (UTC)

OK, Tehonk, I've done that. I have to admit that I was aware neither of that discussion nor of the change made to the G7 criterion – we live and learn! Regards, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:02, 6 February 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for the prompt response and action, it's all good now, cheers. Tehonk (talk) 04:24, 7 February 2025 (UTC)

Nomination of European Regions Airline Association for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article European Regions Airline Association, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/European Regions Airline Association until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 8 February 2025 (UTC)

Wikipedia's Purposeful suppression of relevant information about a growing social movement

Hi Justlettersandnumbers, You deleted my MBenette Sandbox page in which I was working on a very relevant article about the growth of a social movement known as the Passport Bros Movement. A movement that is now quite mainstream, which has garnered well over 1 billion mentions on social media platforms (TikTok, Instagram, Youtube,etc.), numerous articles on various News websites (Fox News, Yahoo Finance, The New Zealand Herald, The Daily Mail, etc.). As well as cable television documentaries (VICE) "Why Are American Men Moving To Colombia? Jamali Maddix Meets The Passport Bros", international news documentaries on China News Asia (CNA): "Why These American Men Are Seeking Love In Asia: The Rise Of Passport Bros | Insight", which has rapidly garnered well over 1.3 Million views. My article is both timely and relevant and not promotional in any way, shape, or form. Writing an article about this rapidly growing social movement is no different than someone in the late 1960's and 1970's writing an article about the rapidly spreading civil rights movement or the hippie movement. The fact that several other people I personally know wrote articles chronicling the global impact this growing movement is currently having on society, which were equally deleted, proves that Wikipedia is purposely suppressing relevant, timely information about this topic.

Nowhere on any part of Wikipedia is there a mention of the Passport Bros Movement, nor any information regarding the verifiable facts about its origins, development, evolution, growth, and global expansion. The fact that it has been growing steadily since 2020 and has been trending steadily for 4 years straight and not covered "at all" by Wikipedia shows a direct bias and suppression of relevant timely social information. There is "one" mention of the term "Passport bro" on Wikipedia, and that contribution is purposely limited in effort to present a biased, unbalanced view of the term.

If Wikipedia is truly about "the freedom of contributing verifiable facts of relevant information," which millions of people want to know more about, Wikipedia would not be purposefully suppressing such relevant, timely information about this social movement. 73.198.106.217 (talk) 20:54, 16 February 2025 (UTC)

(talk page watcher) TikTok, Instagram, Youtube... Fox News, Yahoo Finance, The New Zealand Herald, The Daily Mail. I'm not sure about the NZ Herald, but for the rest please see Wikipedia:Reliable sources. Specifically, why none of them are reliable sources

Fortuna, Imperatrix Mundi 00:03, 17 February 2025 (UTC)

While I thank you for your input, let me just say, there are several other "international news outlets" that have covered this topic (CTN News-Chiang Rai Times, The BBC, Al Jazeera, etc.). Let me guess, those news outlets are "not" considered "Reliable sources" as well? It's quite obvious what's going on here. Wikipedia is cherry-picking what or rather "who" they are willing to let post relevant information. Let's be honest, there are less than several US news outlets here in the United States" that literally control "99.9%" of what information is covered. By owning/having a monopoly on these outlets, they "dictate" what information is released regardless of whether it is relevant or not. And if Wikipedia is solely going off of this criteria to determine what is "reliable" or "credible" source information, then Wikipedia is equally compromised and suspect.

The fact that "reliable" international news outlets "are' steadily covering this growing social topic and only a handful have in the United States proves my point even further. There is undoubtedly a "behind-the-scenes" effort to suppress or negatively influence any relevant information about this topic (Passport Bros Movement) here within the US. If you don't believe me, simply do the research yourself, and you will see a blatant, highly biased, unbalanced perspective/narrative regarding this topic being pushed in Western media outlets (of which Wikipedia is using as "reliable source material").

So much for "the freedom of contributing verifiable facts of relevant information." 73.198.106.217 (talk) 20:36, 17 February 2025 (UTC)

Just a bystander here. But I'd gently suggest taking the advice offered to you several times now to learn more about how Wikipedia articles are written, the rules surrounding sourcing information, and the guidelines on tone and point of view. Beyond that, it's fairly clear that you do not have the necessary background knowledge on this subject to write about it objectively or with any level of expertise. There are innumerable academic papers, peer-reviewed journal articles, books, and other reliable material published on the topic of western men using the power and privilege of their citizenship and relative economic stability to travel to countries in South and East Asia in order to begin relationships with non-western women, something that has not been "trending steadily for 4 years", as you claim, but rather has been an evolving and well-documented (not to mention broadly criticized) practice for a number of decades, if not longer. That you would point to social media posts or outlets like Fox instead of the reliable publications which do exist says a) you have not done the real, sustained reading necessary to understand this topic, and b) you are not yet familiar enough with Wikipedia's rules and guidelines to author a full article. Additionally, your unqualified use of the term "passport bro" and labeling of this activity as a "movement" makes clear that you hold a specific point of view on this topic - or possibly even a conflict of interest - and would have difficulty writing about it with any sense of emotional/political detachment. Justlettersandnumbers seems to have had more than enough rationale to delete the material you were drafting. Would highly recommend, again, reading through the various guides and resources that have been presented to you to help you better understand how to edit on Wikipedia. 19h00s (talk) 21:07, 17 February 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for your timely reply, but I respectfully disagree with you. You are quite mistaken. This point you make right here: " the topic of western men using the power and privilege of their citizenship and relative economic stability to travel to countries in South and East Asia in order to begin relationships with non-western women, something that has not been "trending steadily for 4 years", as you claim, but rather has been an evolving and well-documented (not to mention broadly criticized) practice for a number of decades, if not longer." is highly biased, limited in scope, and quite wrong. This tells me you do not know anything about "this" rapidly spreading movement (and lifestyle choice being adopted by numerous men in Western countries by the day) at all and/or are not privy to the broad scope of what is actually happening within this socially shifting landscape in real time.

Your statement, " it's fairly clear that you do not have the necessary background knowledge on this subject to write about it objectively or with any level of expertise," is so incorrect. You are 100% mistaken, my friend.

Having had real-world "boots on the ground" experience over the last 8 years, within the following countries (Central America, South America, Thailand, Philippines, Brazil, Germany, France, Spain, Italy, Croatia, and the UK), where these men traverse, I'm extremely qualified to report on this subject. Traveling through these countries I have witnessed first-hand, the massive shift of hundreds of men traveling abroad to these places, so my friend, you are quite mistaken. Having spoken with and spent time getting to know many of these guys and their personal stories, your assertion " western men using the power and privilege of their citizenship and relative economic stability to travel to countries in South and East Asia in order to begin relationships with non-western women", is wrong. For many of these men within this growing movement, the "travel for dating" aspect is literally such a small part of why they're leaving their home countries. There are numerous economic and other personal reasons, of which I can see you are not aware and/or not cognizant of. Many of them, especially the large military contingent of this movement, have engaged in personal traveling for therapeutic reasons, dealing with the traumatic residue of PTSD. But that is not covered in your statement at all.

But it's okay.

Even though I highly disagree with the points you've made, I respectfully thank you for the feedback. 73.198.106.217 (talk) 22:10, 17 February 2025 (UTC)

You have just proven both of my points. I'd reiterate my suggestion that you learn how to write for Wikipedia before attempting it, especially what constitutes original research and a neutral point of view. Out of respect for Justlettersandnumbers' time/notifications, I'll refrain from responding any further. 19h00s (talk) 23:49, 17 February 2025 (UTC)

Irish

I actually meant to delete the whole sub-section as irrelevant. Are we going to start including all unrecognized breeds in purebred articles? By doing so, we're giving it recognition. Atsme 💬 📧 21:32, 19 February 2025 (UTC)

Page Deleted: Kemelord

The page was deleted to lack of fully references, now references are available and will like the page to be restored from deletion for further updates and informations needed. Chocobnj (talk) 13:12, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

Correction (again): Kemelord was deleted as WP:CSD#A7: Article about a band, singer, musician, or musical ensemble, which does not credibly indicate the importance or significance of the subject. - UtherSRG (talk) UtherSRG (talk) 13:44, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

Can it be restored back to my draft gor further updates and corrections Chocobnj (talk) 14:27, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

Chocobnj, you re-created Draft:Kemelord on 20 November last year, why don't you work on that? Your first step is to find a good number of independent reliable sources (it has none at all) that support the content and show how the person is notable by our standards, and then remove any content that they don't fully support. Please be aware that if you move it or copy it to mainspace in its present condition it will inevitably be speedily deleted again. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 16:33, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

Please that was the mistake i did, but now there are now references to every information.And before putting anything to mainspace, everything will be verified accurately.

i stopped November 2024 due to huge engagements on researches or other different major topics too. Thanks for understanding. I look forward to reconsideration. Chocobnj (talk) 16:39, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

Company D-1

Hi Justlettersandnumbers, can you please undelete the Company D-1 page? This is not a club or society, but a Military Reserve Officers' Training Corps (ROTC) Outfit, just like Company A-1 already on Wikipedia. I followed Company A-1's format on Wikipedia just so it wouldn't have any issues to be deleted. Company A-1 and D-1 were 2 of the original 4 companies in the Military Reserve Officers' Training Corps in 1876. If your opinion is that this historical ROTC company is not notable, please let me know why. Thank you, bcstringer Bcstringer (talk) 18:23, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

No problem, Bcstringer, done that! I've moved the page to draft space so that it won't be immediately deleted again. Good luck with it! Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:12, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

status dogs in the United Kingdom

I saw you reference status dogs in the United Kingdom in an edit summary on Cane Corso, but Wikipedia doesn't have an article on this nor status dogs in general. Were you perhaps thinking of a different article title? Traumnovelle (talk) 22:06, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

No, Traumnovelle, that was an intentional red link – were there such an article, it might be a suitable place for the content I removed. We don't normally include trivial or marginal uses of things in our pages on them – we don't mention that statues may be toppled or that mirrors are often used to chop cocaine on in those pages, but might do so in pages on other more detailed topics. Thanks for all your good work, regards, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:38, 21 February 2025 (UTC)

I agree that the content is undue, just wasn't sure if there was an actual article on this you were referring to. Traumnovelle (talk) 20:15, 21 February 2025 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: International Christian Medical and Dental Association

Hello Justlettersandnumbers. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of International Christian Medical and Dental Association, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Article is not elegble for speedy deletion as it survived its most recent AFD. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 03:16, 25 February 2025 (UTC)

Bartimaeus (disambiguation)

Can you check that this page did not have significant history? Thanks. Srnec (talk) 13:33, 26 February 2025 (UTC)

Many thanks, Srnec, that was definitely a mistaken deletion, now restored. It may need some editing to bring it into line with dab page norms. Thanks, regards, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 14:34, 26 February 2025 (UTC)

Vosker

Hello, I am trying to understand why you deleted the page on Vosker. The information used was taken from published articles and websites. If there is something I can do to make the content better tonally or otherwise, I'm all ears. Safann (talk) 16:47, 27 February 2025 (UTC)

Safann, if you look at this page you will see that I deleted it as G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion – it read exactly as if it had been written by an employee of the company, or taken directly from its website. It looks as if you will need to make a paid-editor disclosure before contemplating any further edit on that topic. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 17:21, 27 February 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for response. I am new to all of this and trying to learn how to do things correctly.

95% of the content for the page I was working on was directly from published articles (as cited), there was about 5% of the content that came from the company's website - in particular some information about one of the cameras and the company's About Me page (also cited, though perhaps some of the About me section citation could be finessed).

I see the paid-contribution disclosure link that you sent. I do work for the company and I am more than willing to disclose that, though I'm not entirely sure how to do that. If I write, {{paid|employer=VOSKER|client=VOSKER}} under my user name, and add a link to my user name on the company page, does that cover it? Am I understanding this correctly? Safann (talk) 21:45, 27 February 2025 (UTC)

Thanks, Safann, you're on the right track here. I'll leave a (pre-written) message on your talk-page with instructions that I hope are clear – as I should have done yesterday, my apologies! Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 10:32, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

Page Deletion: KPJ Damansara Specialist Hospital

Hi there, is there a way that you can restore this page or move it to a draft page as I work on editing to refine it further. I understand that it was subjected to removal due to unambiguous advertising and I am willing to work on it to make it better. I'm still learning the process of editing on Wikipedia and I will be upfront to mention that I am an employee of the brand. However with that being said, I am here to learn how to do this properly and any form of guidance is much appreciated. Thank you @Meixinfoo Mei Xin Foo (talk) 05:20, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

Mei Xin Foo, this page was already a draft. It was deleted as an advertisement, so I'm not prepared to restore it; however, if you activate your email (which you can do here), I'll email you the text, on the understanding that you will not repost it anywhere in Wikipedia. Let me know? Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 10:29, 28 February 2025 (UTC)