Jump to content

User talk:Jingiby

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Reminders

Momchil (Bulgarian-Ottoman wars page)

[edit]

Replying a bit late, but Momchil was ruler of his independent domain in the Rhodopes. I think I don't need to cite your favorite historian Fine to confirm that, my dear "Jingiby". Anyways, I won't add the list back because Momchil never fought Ottomans. Tsar Unknown (talk) 17:18, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Prilep1944.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Prilep1944.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:23, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Skopje being the capital of Dardania and never being part of Anceint Macedonia

[edit]

Yesterday I removed the part which said Skopje was never part of Ancient Macedonia, however this is not true since in his book A history of Macedonia from Hammond and G.T. Griffith, Griffith writes very specifically that the northern border of the kingdom of Macedonia was until Kacanik pass just north of Skopje. So if historians agree that Phillip II of Macedon's conquests included Skopje can you please explain to me why you reverted the information that Skopje was never part of Ancient Macedonia when clearly at one point it was? I am glad to share the part which states that, and also wikipedia uses that book as a reference multiple times, so why not for this also? 92.53.50.4 (talk) 21:37, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, please read Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (history). Do not use sources older then 50 years when they contradict modern ones. To weight :different views and structure an article so as to avoid original research and synthesis the common views of scholars should be consulted. In many historical topics, scholarship is divided, so several scholarly positions should be relied upon. Some people masquerading as scholars actually present fringe views outside of the accepted practice, and these should not be used.
To determine scholarly opinions about a historical topic, consult the following sources in order:
  1. Recent scholarly books and chapters on the historiography of the topic
  2. "Review Articles", or historiographical essays that explicitly discuss recent scholarship in an area.
  3. Similarly (i.e. recent) conference papers that were peer reviewed in full before publication that are field reviews or have as their central argument the historiography, etc.
Also read the article on Scupi. Scupi became the capital of Dardania, which extended from Naissus to Bylazora, in the second century BC. The Dardanians had remained independent after the Roman conquest of Macedonia, because they had supported the Romans, hoping to enlarge their territory in this way. It is not clear when the Romans finally annexed Dardania and it seems most likely that the Dardani actually lost independence in 28 BC. Scupi grew up as a colony of legionnaires, mainly veterans of the Legio VII Claudia in the time of Domitian (AD 81–96),Jingiby (talk) 13:33, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Lozanoski painting of Mariovo buna

[edit]

The painting should be okay considering it was published in a newspaper or i am wrong? and his paintings are published by the Museum of art. History Rade (talk) 14:40, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

History Rade please, read Wikipedia:Copyrights#Guidelines_for_images_and_other_media_files. Images, photographs, video and sound files, like written works, are subject to copyright. Someone holds the copyright unless the work has explicitly been placed in the public domain. Jingiby (talk) 14:56, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]