governmental regulation of firearm ownership; the social, historical and political context of such regulation; and the people and organizations associated with these issues
gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them
genetically modified organisms, commercially produced agricultural chemicals and the companies that produce them, broadly construed
You closed a discussion on the Jorts (cat) Talk page (In-Universe Style) immediately after I had made a comment on it without providing a summary or assessing consensus—I saw no obvious consensus on the topic. You stated that it was over a year old, and yet my comment was only 4 minutes old. Considering the discussion to that point had been short and that I had just joined, it seemed an inappropriate move. There were other discussion from the same time period that had gone on considerably longer. Why did you close this one? Ghost writer's cat (talk) 21:37, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
That was four months ago and you're just now bringing it up?
Yes, I closed it because responding to year-old sections is not helpful. If you want to suggest a new change to the article, start a new section. This is standard practice. — The Hand That Feeds You:Bite13:48, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
