User talk:Eltabar243
Welcome!
[edit]Hi Eltabar243! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! Ekdalian (talk) 14:13, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
December 2024
[edit]
Hi Eltabar243! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Zuṭṭ several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.
All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Zuṭṭ, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Ekdalian (talk) 14:15, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
January 2025
[edit] Hello, I'm Garudam. I noticed that you recently removed content from Siege of Kampili without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Garuda Talk! 19:40, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
Removal on Siege of Samarkhel
[edit]Hello, I am @AfghanParatrooper19891, I noticed you reverted content from the “Siege of Samarkhel” Wikipedia page and then removed the entire page after to make a redirect to the First Siege of Samarkhel. The Siege of Samarkhel lasted 4 months overall, there was no first or second siege. The siege started successfully for the Mujahideen, and then by June 1989 it ended and the Mujahideen did not attempt to stop it from happening after. Another user has also reverted your reverts, and you additionally seem to have a history of making random reverts for articles, which is against the rules. AfghanParatrooper19891 (talk) 16:13, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
February 2025
[edit] Hello, I'm Garudam. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Battle of Kaiser-e-Hind Fortress, but the source cited did not support that content. It has been removed for now, but if you would like to include a citation that verifies the content and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. – Garuda Talk! 14:18, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
Signature
[edit]I think you have copied my signature style as it is. Please distinguish your signature, a little bit of copying would do but not the exact same. Best, – Garuda Talk! 22:54, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
- Also @Eltabar243, see: WP:CUSTOMSIG/P – Garuda Talk! 22:55, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
Nomination of First Siege of Samarkhel for deletion
[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/First Siege of Samarkhel until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.– Garuda Talk! 23:30, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
Nomination of Capture of Wasit for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Capture of Wasit until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.– Garuda Talk! 23:46, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Capture of Wasit
[edit]
Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing hoaxes, such as Capture of Wasit, is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Rubik's Cube 3x3 (talk) 19:01, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of First Siege of Samarkhel
[edit]Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing hoaxes, such as First Siege of Samarkhel, is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Rubik's Cube 3x3 (talk) 19:15, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
Nomination of Siege of Samarkhel for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Siege of Samarkhel until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.