User talk:Densmartasvensken

I’m half Uzbek and Tajik😎

Welcome!

Hi Densmartasvensken! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Jay8g [V•T•E] 04:43, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jay8g thanks, I appreciate that!

I hope we can discuss and help each other more in the future! Densmartasvensken (talk) 05:03, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Uzbek language. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 08:21, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ok I understand Densmartasvensken (talk) 08:22, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Can Joshua project be Used as an Reliable source? Densmartasvensken (talk) 08:25, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

June 2025

Hello, I'm Mellk. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Emirate of Bukhara, but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mellk (talk) 06:55, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I will provide it, soon. No problem and thanks for your notice, I appreciate it. Densmartasvensken (talk) 06:56, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bukhara. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. HistoryofIran (talk) 17:16, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, birodar jon! I will do that next time! Densmartasvensken (talk) 18:32, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There is no need to engage in vandalism....

Hello, I'm Strikebella. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Uzbeks have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Strikebella (talk) 10:31, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thanks Densmartasvensken (talk) 11:43, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

How did i do Vandalism? Explain more please Densmartasvensken (talk) 11:43, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Uzbeks speak also Khwarazmian Uzbek language with is different from standard uzbek and have different roots. Densmartasvensken (talk) 11:45, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You reason very irrationally and delete sources in violation of Wikipedia rules.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Khanate of Khiva. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Strikebella (talk) 05:29, 28 June 2025 (UTC) (suitable for intentional nonsense or disruption)[reply]

I delated something not relevant. Its you who only working with vandalism, you removed 20 sources and 1000 words from Khwarazmian language. Densmartasvensken (talk) 07:35, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Afghani Uzbeks

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Afghani Uzbeks requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. 𒁂 🇿 🇷 🇾 🇰 ࿐ 17:03, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Khwarazmian Uzbek language moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Khwarazmian Uzbek language. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it consists of machine-generated text. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. —pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 21:13, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No problem i will change the text to normal Densmartasvensken (talk) 21:14, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

How i get access to edit the page, and fix everything? Densmartasvensken (talk) 21:17, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

July 2025

Hello, I'm Vanilla Wizard. An edit that you recently made to Registan seemed to be generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology). Text produced by these applications can be unsuitable for an encyclopedia, and output must be carefully checked. Your edit may have been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Vanilla Wizard 💙 00:51, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi thanks, no problem I fixed that now. Thanks again Densmartasvensken (talk) 01:28, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, we still cannot say something like "Registan truly embodies the essence of Uzbek culture and identity. This stunning square, flanked by three magnificent madrasas, stands as a testament to the nation’s rich history, Islamic scholarship, and architectural genius. As a UNESCO World Heritage Site, it proudly represents Uzbek heritage and is an essential destination for anyone visiting the region." This is opinion text and reads like a persuasive essay, not something that would be in a Wikipedia article. Vanilla Wizard 💙 02:02, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Why? Densmartasvensken (talk) 02:04, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The issue here is those sentences state opinions as facts. Wikipedia is written in a neutral, dispassionate, encyclopedic tone, which is a bit different from the types of writing you would find in a persuasive essay, news article, or op-ed.

Here's some links to related Wikipedia policies and guidelines:

Vanilla Wizard 💙 02:18, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Vanilla Wizard 💙 00:59, 25 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I know the above template looks intimidating, but I don't mean for it to come off as threatening. But I've tried to explain to you several times already what exactly was wrong with your additions and why Wikipedia cannot use language like "these grand majestic masterpieces" in its articles. Please understand. I know you're a new editor, but WP:NPOV and the other policies and guidelines I linked to you above are very important to internalize if you want to make good edits to Wikipedia going forward. Vanilla Wizard 💙 01:09, 25 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You reason very irrationally and delete sources in violation of Wikipedia rules.

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Sart, you may be blocked from editing. Strikebella (talk) 14:49, 11 July 2025 (UTC) ("please stop" for use after level 2 warning)[reply]

If Tajiks where Sarts you should provide with reliable source. The source you provide says that Tajiks were not Sarts. So i will remove that if you don’t provide it with reliable source Densmartasvensken (talk) 17:02, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@HistoryofIran| Please help me in this situation, @Strikebella is removing thousands of Information. @Strikebella, is putting info without sources. Thanks! Densmartasvensken (talk) 17:08, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@HistoryofIran Look at @Strikebella last Edit on ”Uzbeks”. She is claiming that 3 million Uzbeks living in Tajikistan without any reliable sources. Densmartasvensken (talk) 17:29, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but can't you two discuss it on the talk page of the article? Or if they are indeed disruptive then you can report them to WP:ANI. HistoryofIran (talk) 14:39, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes of course Densmartasvensken (talk) 14:40, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You reason very irrationally and in many cases delete information without reason.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Sart. Strikebella (talk) 16:26, 12 July 2025 (UTC) (last warning for vandalism)[reply]

Look can we discuss? Densmartasvensken (talk) 11:07, 13 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@HistoryofIran Help here please. Densmartasvensken (talk) 11:11, 13 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

blocked from editingwithout further warning you may be the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Sart. (last warning for vandalism) Densmartasvensken (talk) 11:14, 13 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary again, as you did at Sart, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Strikebella (talk) 17:04, 13 July 2025 (UTC) (only warning; for many blankings in a short period of time)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Khwarazmian Uzbek language (August 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Fade258 were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Their outputs usually have multiple issues that prevent them from meeting our guidelines on writing articles. These include:

Promotional tone, editorializing and other words to watch
Vague, generic, and speculative statements extrapolated from similar subjects
Essay-like writing
Hallucinations (plausible-sounding, but false information) and non-existent references
Close paraphrasing

Please address these issues. The best way is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Looks like an AI generated article as well as some references also.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Khwarazmian Uzbek language and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fade258 (talk) 14:20, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Densmartasvensken! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Fade258 (talk) 14:20, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

August 2025

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Sart, you may be blocked from editing. HistoryofIran (talk) 20:20, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please provide reliable source of that is true. Densmartasvensken (talk) 20:21, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The link is not working, provide it with a link that’s working or i will remove. Densmartasvensken (talk) 20:27, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The link clearly works, a bit slow, but it works. You need to start writing edit summaries. HistoryofIran (talk) 20:35, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A quick look at your edits shows that you are still causing trouble, please stop. Remember, we base our info on WP:RS, nothing else. HistoryofIran (talk) 20:47, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok sorry Densmartasvensken (talk) 00:43, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]