Jump to content

User talk:Cremastra/Archive 5

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1←Archive 3Archive 4Archive 5

Your edit on Tonyukuk

How did this happen? Can't see it on your edit history. Beshogur (talk) 13:23, 28 December 2024 (UTC)

Try this search instead – it's just above dwarf lizard. And it looks like ref has since been improved. Cremastra 🎄 u — c 🎄 15:41, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
Oh, I see know. The website is down, and turned into a illegal betting website. I was confused. Beshogur (talk) 16:23, 28 December 2024 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tetraclita rubescens, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Darwin.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 31 December 2024 (UTC)

Leech article

Hello. Do you plan on getting that leech article to FA? We could use more of them. LittleJerry (talk) 00:50, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Ha ha, maybe one day. I'll focus on GA for now, since it'll be my first if it passes. My "secret" goal was actually to make Macrobdella a good topic, but that might actually be more work than an FA. Thanks for the encouragement, though. Cremastra (u — c) 00:52, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject AI Cleanup/AI images in non-AI contexts

Thanks for helping to bring this up to date! The page is trying to keep track of for what reasons, if any, that they were kept in or removed from articles, I assume to give some grist to any future policy discussions on the subject, so it'd be good to have a few words recorded on why each image was considered unsuitable. Belbury (talk) 19:09, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Thanks, I've added explanations based on the edit summaries. Cremastra (u — c) 19:27, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Macrobdella decora

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Macrobdella decora you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of An anonymous username, not my real name -- An anonymous username, not my real name (talk) 19:43, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Macrobdella decora

The article Macrobdella decora you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Macrobdella decora and Talk:Macrobdella decora/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of An anonymous username, not my real name -- An anonymous username, not my real name (talk) 02:00, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Macrobdella decora

The article Macrobdella decora you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Macrobdella decora for comments about the article, and Talk:Macrobdella decora/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of An anonymous username, not my real name -- An anonymous username, not my real name (talk) 17:42, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Your recent edit on Overdale, Telford

Hi, I noticed you deleted this article without first discussing it with the relevant geography page. Please do not delete page based on your opinion. It needs to be discussed first with other editors. Thanks DragonofBatley (talk) 22:26, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

I have responded on your talk page after my WP:BOLD action, as per WP:BRD. I also see that you wrote this article today, well after concerns of text/source integrity and factual accuracy were raised on your talk page. I'm confused as to how this keeps happening. These do not seem to be plausible mistakes to make. Cremastra (u — c) 23:18, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

RFC Notice

Hello, this notice is for everyone who took part in the 2023 RfC on lists of airline destinations. I have started a new RfC on the subject. If you would like to participate please follow this link: Wikipedia talk:What Wikipedia is not § RfC on WP:NOT and British Airways destinations. Sunnya343 (talk) 01:10, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Arthur Phillip

Thankyou for your work on the article to help it be saved at the GAR. – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 12:12, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

You're welcome. Cremastra (u — c) 12:58, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Left brain

Hi, thank you for your contributions. I note your recent undo of the dabpage at Left brain.

I had originally done this as a straight hatnote[1], but was reverted.

Keeping the primary redirect and creating Left brain (disambiguation) doesn't work, as it becomes a case of WP:ONEOTHER.

Left brain/Left Brain are definitely ambiguous and this needs to be addressed somehow. How do you propose we do so? 162 etc. (talk) 16:55, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

You're right about WP:ONEOTHER, I'd forgotten about that.
The hatnote seems like the right approach given that there is scope for confusion here. @Opolito: you removed the hatnote, can you clarify why you think it's a problem? Thanks, Cremastra (u — c) 21:05, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
The musician Left Brain isn't notable - the previous page about them was deleted because of that. The discography page clearly isn't notable either and will be deleted shortly. Opolito (talk) 21:54, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Draughton, North Yorkshire

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Draughton, North Yorkshire you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Vigilantcosmicpenguin -- Vigilantcosmicpenguin (talk) 23:27, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Draughton, North Yorkshire

The article Draughton, North Yorkshire you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Draughton, North Yorkshire and Talk:Draughton, North Yorkshire/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Vigilantcosmicpenguin -- Vigilantcosmicpenguin (talk) 00:24, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Notice of Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents discussion

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Me (DragonofBatley). Thank you. Tarlby (t) (c) 22:58, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Yes, I got DragonofBatley's ping already. Thanks, Cremastra (u — c) 23:02, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Draughton, North Yorkshire

The article Draughton, North Yorkshire you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Draughton, North Yorkshire for comments about the article, and Talk:Draughton, North Yorkshire/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Vigilantcosmicpenguin -- Vigilantcosmicpenguin (talk) 03:45, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

@Vigilantcosmicpenguin Thanks for a fair and speedy review! Cremastra (u — c) 20:42, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Thanks?

Okay, Vanderwaalforces, you've piqued my curiosity: why did you thank me for this edit? :) Cremastra (u — c) 21:56, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Hehe, I was actually seeing you do the SuggestBot thingy... I was wondering what you were doing, but as soon as I saw the "Utterly unhelpful", I was like "I thought as much, thanks!", lol Vanderwaalforces (talk) 22:05, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

The Signpost: 15 January 2025

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:53, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Clean-up

Hi - very much appreciate the offer to work on this. I've done a table here, User:KJP1/sandbox10-DoB. It's basically the CCI approach:

  • Review the article
  • Take any remedial action - redraft/re-source/delete content/merge/AfD etc.
  • Note the decision in the final column - just over-write any existing wikicode.
  • Record any wider issues, questions/learning points for DoB at the top.

Rupples and I have tried a few for size, and it seems to work, but completely open to any suggestions for improvement. The more difficult issue is how to effectively involve DoB. That's of course essential, but may prove harder to achieve. Again, any suggestions welcome. KJP1 (talk) 16:53, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

Looks good, I've gotten started. Cremastra (u — c) 18:05, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Balanus trigonus

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Balanus trigonus you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Esculenta -- Esculenta (talk) 19:06, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

DYK for Castilleja chromosa

On 19 January 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Castilleja chromosa, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the flowers of the desert paintbrush (example pictured) are small, green, and unremarkable? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Castilleja chromosa. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Castilleja chromosa), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—Ganesha811 (talk) 12:02, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Credit for this should go to or at the very least be shared with MtBotany, who has written most of the article. Cremastra (u — c) 15:32, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
Thanks. Though I'm not that concerned with credit for DYK. I just love seeing plants get onto Wikipedia's front page. Also: group effort. I probably would have put this species off for another year while being distracted by other species. Seeing others work on it inspired me to pitch in. 🌿MtBotany (talk) 22:00, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
Cremastra (talk) 22:01, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Plantae Barnstar
Co-awarded to you and MtBotany for your work at Castilleja chromosa. TheTechnician27 (Talk page) 13:07, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Cremastra/Archive_5&oldid=1277980580"