User talk:Constant314/Archive 10
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Constant314. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 5 | ← | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 |
Just for interest, which WP guideline is violated by powerstream.com?
Ref. Ampacity. PeterEasthope (talk) 20:40, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
- I make a lot of edits. When you ask an editor about an edit, it is best to include the diff (the URL of the page showing the edit). Here is the diff for this edit diff
- See WP:EL for general guidelines.
- In this case:
- The link did not have any information that could not be added to the article.
- The link is to a commercial website full of product for sale. You can get around this if you can link directly to the useful information without seeing promotional material. For example, some manufacturers provide links white papers on a useful subject without seeing any advertising. Here is an example that would not be overly promotional: [1]. It does use the manufacturer's products for examples, but there are no offers to sell. It also has information that cannot be included in an article because of the length.
- The site is not a reliable source. See WP:RS.
- Constant314 (talk) 21:09, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
- OK, thanks, ... PeterEasthope (talk) 15:45, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Your Comments on ESAB
Thanks so much for looking over my proposed updates to the page awhile back. [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Electrical_engineering#I_could_use_some_help_with_updating_ESAB] The Request Edits still haven’t been reviewed, even though I cut back the list from 8 to 4. Would you mind taking a look again and implementing these if you still think they’re reasonable? Request no. 4 is new since the last time you looked at these. Thanks so much for your time. Wiki-Free-Pie (talk) 20:52, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, they still look good. I added a comment to the talk page that encouraged you to go ahead and make the changes yourself. I think you have completed the necessary due diligence. If you would message me when you are done, I will review them and comment. Constant314 (talk) 21:48, 7 August 2024 (UTC)