User talk:CHr0m4tiko0

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Jlnramos! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 23:08, Sunday, September 27, 2020 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Jlnramos! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 23:13, Sunday, September 27, 2020 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

November 2024

Hello, I'm Ss112. I noticed that you made one or more edits to an article, Disease (Lady Gaga song), concerning the updates of review statistics, box office numbers, sports statistics, or some other frequently updated data with a fixed web address, but you did not update the |access-date= parameter in the citation template. The |access-date= parameter is the full date when the content pointed to by the URL was last verified to be working and supporting the text being cited in the article. This means that the parameter needs to be updated whenever the content is updated. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Ss112 17:41, 8 November 2024 (UTC)

@Ss112

Sorry, I forgot to update the access-date. The song reached position 54 in its second week, as referenced on this page: https://dutchcharts.nl/showitem.asp?interpret=Lady+Gaga&titel=Disease&cat=s. I'll be sure to pay attention to both updates next time. CHr0m4tiko0 (talk) 17:54, 8 November 2024 (UTC)

January 2025

Please stop. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Do not edit against the manual of style. livelikemusic (TALK!) 20:03, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

@Livelikemusic I am literally copying as it is posted in Artpop, stylized ARTPOP, and I placed the references that corroborate the information, I am not vandalizing the article, I simply want to contribute, as you will see in the discussion where I offered my content from Wikipedia in Spanish to use as backup, since it was made by me. CHr0m4tiko0 (talk) 20:05, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Per MOS:MUSICCAPS—which has been noted several times—it states: Exceptions are not made to mimic logo/cover stylization, even if such mimicry is common in the music press. Both Apple Music and Spotify are not acceptable in order to violate the standing MOS policy. livelikemusic (TALK!) 20:08, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

@Livelikemusic but I'm not imitating it, I didn't put "MAYHEM" anywhere, I'm just clarifying that it is capitalized. Lady Gaga's official website and the Interscope Records website are also not enough sources? And in that case, what do you do with Artpop? In the article it is clarified that it is written in capital letters. CHr0m4tiko0 (talk) 20:12, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

No, they are not. Per MOS, we do not note the "stylization". Same goes for Artpop. Also, please stop tagging me in each response, thank you. livelikemusic (TALK!) 20:15, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

References

Note

Just a note: citing websites/links in edit summaries is not acceptable, in terms of citing reasons for any edit. livelikemusic (TALK!) 03:45, 3 February 2025 (UTC)

Sorry, I didn’t know. I won’t include links in edit summaries again. The information about Mayhem was confirmed by Universal Music Italia (Universal Music). I have added the reference properly within the article. CHr0m4tiko0 (talk) 04:03, 3 February 2025 (UTC)

Nomination of Mayhem on the Beach for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mayhem on the Beach is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mayhem on the Beach until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Sricsi (talk) 20:44, 3 March 2025 (UTC)

Nomination of Killah (song) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Killah (song) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Killah (song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

꧁Zanahary꧂ 19:55, 17 March 2025 (UTC)

Zombieboy was also nominated for deletion, if you're interested in weighing in or making improvements to the article. Either way, happy editing! ---Another Believer _(Talk) 14:00, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Ditto LoveDrug - I sure wish editors would give these articles more than a few minutes in the main space before nominating for deletion after being accepted at Articles for Creation. Oh well, happy editing! ---Another Believer _(Talk) 20:53, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mayhem (Lady Gaga album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Variety. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:53, 22 March 2025 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Lady Gaga - Mayhem on the Beach.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Lady Gaga - Mayhem on the Beach.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:23, 23 March 2025 (UTC)

Hi. Sorry to bother you but I would like that you undo your edition since both Hits and Rolling Stone have reported that the dates in Mexico, Brazil and Singapore are part of the tour, and Hits lists the full dates of the tour as of now which includes these dates I mentioned above. For your consideration, on the official Weibo account of Universal Music China, it confirms the Singapore dates are part of the tour and the only dates in Asia in 2025. Thanks! Rockiron99 (talk) 15:47, 27 March 2025 (UTC)

Mayhem Ball

Hi. Sorry to bother you but I would like that you undo your edition since both Hits and Rolling Stone have reported that the dates in Mexico, Brazil and Singapore are part of the tour, and Hits lists the full dates of the tour as of now which includes these dates I mentioned above. For your consideration, on the official Weibo account of Universal Music China, it confirms the Singapore dates are part of the tour and the only dates in Asia in 2025. Thanks! Rockiron99 (talk) 16:11, 27 March 2025 (UTC)

Hi @Rockiron99, thank you for your message! I understand the concern, but I believe there is strong reason to keep these concerts separate. While Hits Daily Double and Rolling Stone mention them in relation to the tour, Gaga and her team never officially promoted the Mexico, Brazil, or Singapore shows as part of The Mayhem Ball. Each concert had its own name and branding — Long Live Mayhem, Mayhem on the Beach, Lion City Mayhem — and no tour branding was used at the time of their announcement.

Also, both Live Nation and Ticketmaster (signup.ticketmaster.com/ladygaga) distinguish between these early promotional concerts and the actual The Mayhem Ball tour. Live Nation even lists them separately, using their unique titles. This follows a pattern in Gaga’s career — she previously did early standalone events before launching the full tour (e.g. ArtRave, Dive Bar Tour, Born This Way festival appearances). For clarity and accuracy, keeping the concerts in a separate article better reflects how they were originally presented to the public. If there’s a future confirmation that retroactively includes these concerts as part of the tour, we can always revisit it.

CHr0m4tiko0 (talk) 16:18, 27 March 2025 (UTC)

That's alright. Thanks. Or we could see whether the revenue of these dates would be calculated together with the arena dates. :) Rockiron99 (talk) 16:20, 27 March 2025 (UTC)