User talk:BongPhysicist

February 2021

Hello, I'm DEFCON5. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Aligarh Muslim University, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. defcon5 (talk) 14:08, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi BongPhysicist! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Aligarh Muslim University that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. defcon5 (talk) 14:10, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

BongPhysicist, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi BongPhysicist! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like GreenMeansGo (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sir Syed Global Scholar Award (SSGSA) (June 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gheus was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sir Syed Global Scholar Award (SSGSA) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gheus (talk) 21:10, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the helpful feedback on the previous submission.

I have now substantially revised the draft to address the notability and sourcing concerns. Specifically:

1. I have added multiple secondary, reliable, and independent sources that provide in-depth coverage of the Sir Syed Global Scholar Award (SSGSA), including coverage from Hindustan Times, Business Standard, The Higher Education Review, Ummid News, Muslim Mirror etc.

2. These sources offer detailed reports on the award's recipients, the program's history, and its impact, going beyond passing mentions.

3. The article has been rewritten to reflect a neutral, encyclopedic tone, with citations clearly attributing information to verifiable sources.

4. The program's collaborations with U.S. institutions and its role in international research contributions, including recognition by the Breakthrough Prize in Fundamental Physics, have also been cited using an independent university press release.

I believe the subject now meets the general notability guidelines for inclusion on Wikipedia, and I respectfully request reconsideration of the draft for acceptance.

Thank you again for your time and guidance. BongPhysicist (talk) 14:24, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sir Syed Global Scholar Award (June 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bunnypranav were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sir Syed Global Scholar Award and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 15:48, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the feedback on the earlier draft. I have now revised the article thoroughly to address the concerns raised:

1. The tone has been rewritten to adopt a neutral, encyclopedic style, avoiding promotional language.

2. The article now cites a diverse range of independent, reliable, and secondary sources, including coverage from Business Standard, Hindustan Times, The Higher Education Review, and others. These sources independently verify the program’s activities and impact.

3. I have removed or reworded subjective phrasing and emphasized factual reporting based on coverage from reputable publications.

4. Notability is demonstrated through sustained media attention over multiple years, the international academic footprint of its alumni, and its inclusion in collaborations recognized by prestigious awards such as the Breakthrough Prize in Fundamental Physics.

I believe these changes bring the article in line with Wikipedia’s policies on neutrality, verifiability, and notability. Thank you again for your time and consideration. BongPhysicist (talk) 21:51, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sir Syed Global Scholar Award (June 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Owais Khursheed was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sir Syed Global Scholar Award and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Owais Khursheed (Talk to me) 14:11, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]