User talk:BappleBusiness

Quits in United States (from 2012)

Hello! Could you please update this chart? It has been some months since January. Thank you! Nerd271 (talk) 21:50, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

Will do! Just so you know, the stats are always about three months behind, so I'll only be able to update to March. BappleBusiness^[talk] 22:16, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

No worries! No rush if you are busy with school or life. Cheers! Nerd271 (talk) 16:38, 25 May 2023 (UTC)

Hello again! If you have some free time, please update the chart. It is my understanding that the American economy has had a rather eventful summer. Best wishes! Nerd271 (talk) 16:15, 9 December 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for reminding me- I'm in the middle of finals at the moment, but I'll try to do it as soon as possible! BappleBusiness^[talk] 18:41, 9 December 2023 (UTC)

Happy new year! I hope your final exams went well. What are you studying, by the way?

The latest available data (October 2023) suggests that the quit rate has fallen almost what it was in January 2020. It seems that those reports are right. The Great Resignation is essentially over. Nerd271 (talk) 23:42, 30 December 2023 (UTC)

Thank you, I'm studying political science! I hope your new year went well. I just updated the chart, sorry for the delay. Luckily with the event being over, I will only probably have to update it once or twice more. BappleBusiness^[talk] 20:08, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

The chart looks great. Thank you! I agree. Perhaps another update sometime this summer would be enough, at least for this context.

If you don't mind, what program(s) did you use to create the chart? I'm curious. Nerd271 (talk) 00:07, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

I just used Google Sheets, nothing fancy. BappleBusiness^[talk] 01:35, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

I see. Because you generated the image as a scalable vector graphic, I honestly thought you used specialized software or wrote some computer code. It turns out that I could do the same using LibreOffice.org, though I never tested that feature. Perhaps I will soon. Cheers! Nerd271 (talk) 00:27, 22 January 2024 (UTC)

Hello again, fellow editor! I hope your summer is enjoyable. Could you please update this chart some time before the school year restarts? Given current trends, this will likely be the last necessary update. By the way, the employment-population ratio among people aged 25-54 has surged above pre-pandemic levels, though not to the record set in the late 1990s. Labor force participation has not done that in part because of population aging. The Baby Boomers started entering retirement age in the 2010s. (Of course, the Great Recession played a key role as well.) Nerd271 (talk) 00:31, 18 June 2024 (UTC)

Hi @Nerd271, I'm gonna edit it to be to go to the end of the year - January 2024. Do you think we need it to end farther? If so, I'll have to update it at least one more time because the latest numbers will change a little bit in the next few months. BappleBusiness^[talk] 22:36, 19 June 2024 (UTC)

On the second thought, I think it is perfect the way it is, January 2012 to January 2024. Thank you! Nerd271 (talk) 14:11, 23 June 2024 (UTC)

CS1 error on Frances England

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Frances England, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 11:23, 5 June 2023 (UTC)

Re: Indy100

Hi, regarding your revert on GeorgeNotFound - please can you update WP:RSP entry for Independent to mention indy100 was once deemed unreliable? Also I absolutely disagree that sexual assualt allegations belong in the lead especially when it has led to the subject of the article to delete all social media and an indefinite hiatus of their work. Your language in that edit is very worrying. daylon124 (talk) 09:37, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

Hi @Dyln1, I'll update the perennial sources noticeboard now. When I said that the sexual assault allegations don't belong in the lead, I don't mean to imply that they aren't important, but that placing them in the lead places undue weight on them. When determining due weight, we have to go by prevalence in reliable sources, and we have to exercise caution when dealing with a biography of a living person. Right now, it's debatable whether we can even include the allegations, so if we were to include them, we probably shouldn't place them in the most prominent part of the article. BappleBusiness^[talk] 22:11, 19 June 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for your explanation and for your effort. I will continue to monitor for any reliable sources on the subject. dyln (talk) 01:44, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:National Youth Rights Association logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:National Youth Rights Association logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:31, 16 October 2024 (UTC)

Article for The Tim Ferriss Show

Hi BappleBusiness, I'm trying to create an article for Tim Ferriss's podcast, The Tim Ferriss Show. I see that you recently contributed to the podcast page, so I hope you'll have an interest in looking at the draft I have posted here. Would you consider moving it to main space? I really appreciate your help. Coyoteadventures (talk) 14:26, 18 November 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

Clinton Health Access Initiative (CHAI) representation on Wikipedia

Dear BappleBusiness,

We hope you are doing well today. We wanted to reach out to you as we see you have been an active editor on the Clinton Foundation Wikipedia page.

We wanted to flag some errors in how CHAI is represented on Wikipedia. After reading through your policies, we understand that we cannot edit the content about us as that would be a conflict of interest. So we wanted to reach out and ask for your help.

There is one overriding issue of concern which is that CHAI has been separate from the Clinton Foundation for over 10 years. We incorporated as a separate 501c3 and have not been part of the Clinton Foundation since 2010. We have our own board, and as you can see here https://www.clintonhealthaccess.org/financial-statement/chai-financials-2017/, here https://www.clintonhealthaccess.org/financial-statement/chai-financials-2018/ and here https://www.clintonhealthaccess.org/financial-statement/chai-financials-2019/ (for example), we file our own tax returns and annual reports to the government, and we are not connected financially or through governance to the Clinton Foundation.

Would you be able to help separate CHAI from the Clinton Foundation's Wikipedia page? We are happy to provide you any additional sources or documentation you may need to verify this. Beyond that, much of the work that the media has documented CHAI doing is also not on our Wikipedia page. But we view that as a secondary issue to the fact that it still looks like we are an arm of the Clinton Foundation on Wikipedia.

Is this something you can help us with? Or point us in the right direction to address this issue?

Many thanks in advance for your assistance. Best, CHAI Comms Team PressCHAI (talk) 21:21, 28 March 2025 (UTC)

I actually haven't been very active on the page, you might be better off reaching out to some other editors who have made more contributions and are more familiar with the subject (see the edit history and the revision statistics). From looking at the page, I don't see anything that contradicts what you're saying -- it seems to state that CHAI was spun off from the Clinton Foundation in 2010. If there is anything specifically on the page currently that is incorrect and you can provide reputable secondary coverage confirming that, I can try to fix it.

The organization doesn't have to be part of the Clinton Foundation to fit on the Clinton Foundation page. Splitting off the section on CHAI to be a new article is an issue of notability, which is determined by the amount of reliable, independent sources on a topic. From my quick search, I couldn't find many reliable, independent sources about CHAI's work, which makes me inclined to say that it should remain a section as part of the Clinton Foundation article. For more information on this, see Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies) and Wikipedia:Notability § Whether to create standalone pages. BappleBusiness^[talk] 22:38, 28 March 2025 (UTC)

Thank you very much for your reply. We do think it is confusing for readers to have two legally separate organizations under one Wikipedia page but we also appreciate that you are not very active on this page. We also understand what you are saying about how we do not have a ton of press as our previous leadership did not resource a large comms function. But we have been covered by several reputable outlets recently which shows how our work is completely separate and distinct from the Clinton Foundation. Here are some links if that helps support our request. Would you be able to quickly scan them and see if you agree with us about breakout CHAI out to have its own page? Thank you again for your time.

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cy0xk86l9g9o

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/09/26/health/united-nations-drug-resistance-antibiotics.html

https://www.aljazeera.com/opinions/2022/12/6/and-hiv-free-world-is-finally-within-reach

https://www.macfound.org/press/semifinalist-profile/clinton-health-access-initiative-murdoch-childrens-research-institute

https://grist.org/looking-forward/how-do-you-take-clean-ac-mainstream-this-global-health-organization-has-some-ideas/

https://pmnch.who.int/news-and-events/news/item/08-02-2024-partner-spotlight-clinton-health-access-initiative-(chai) PressCHAI (talk) 16:45, 15 April 2025 (UTC)

Hi there. Quick check in for feedback. Cheers PressCHAI (talk) 14:23, 17 April 2025 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 29

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Edward Atkyns (politician), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Revolution of 1688.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:53, 29 March 2025 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Scott Street

The article Scott Street has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Other than Scott Street (Phoebe Bridgers song), all of the articles listed are only partial title matches. None would be reasonably confused with "Scott Street", and thus should not be included as per WP:PARTIAL. Disambiguation is thus unnecessary.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This is an automated notification. Please refer to the page's history for further information. DatBot (talk) 00:31, 4 April 2025 (UTC)