User talk:Bagelpigeon

This is Bagelpigeon's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jeanine Cummins (December 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CASSIOPEIA was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jeanine Cummins and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Jeanine Cummins, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 03:31, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bagelpigeon! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 03:31, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jeanine Cummins has been accepted

Jeanine Cummins, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Redirect-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Praxidicae (talk) 15:46, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

HB Antwerp

Hi Bagelpigeon, it's nice to meet you. My name is Margaux, I work for HB Antwerp and have been working on a draft for the company. I noticed that you created the Sewelo article and included a mention of the company there, so thought you might be willing to take a look at the draft and see if it's ready for inclusion. I'm not publishing it myself due to my COI. Thanks for your help, Margxx (talk) 13:37, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Bagelpigeon. Thank you for your work on A.J. Smith (professor). Another editor, Gheus, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for your work. Please try to include secondary sources in the future to make it easier for reviewers to assess notability. I have done it for you this time.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Gheus}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Gheus (talk) 12:30, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]