User talk:Azuuuu

October 2023

Hello, I'm Paper9oll. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Fifty Fifty (group), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 05:42, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2024

Hello! I'm Swatjester. Your recent edit(s) to the page Cognitive warfare appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been reverted for now. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please do not make changes to de-jargonify definitions as you did at Cognitive warfare. As a quote, we need to keep it an accurate representation of what the source claims. ⇒SWATJester ^{Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat!} 17:48, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

on btd6

ooh, you're getting involved? nice

one thing to probably note is that, per a couple of miscellaneous guidelines, citing sources for basic things in works, like gameplay and plot, is appreciated, but not absolutely necessary. granted, this doesn't apply to anything that could veer into original research... thus, the following sentence can exist without a source:

"balloons tower defenders episode 6 is a tower defense game"

however, for example, the following sentence can't:

"the apex plasma master is seen as the weakest paragon in the game"

as it's ultimately an opinion, which requires backing to avoid the risk of npov violations

this is just a roundabout way of saying that, in the end, while your work was good, i don't think that specific section needs a cn template lol. doesn't change the fact that a lot of bloons-related articles are struggling with mos issues either way... consarn _{(speak evil) (see evil)} 23:59, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Morialta Secondary College has been accepted

Morialta Secondary College, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

GMH Melbourne (talk) 00:42, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]