User talk:Ayaasho

Welcome!

Hi Ayaasho! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing!

Pizza on Pineapple (talk) 15:12, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you sir Ayaasho (talk) 18:14, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jhankar for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jhankar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jhankar until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

🇧🇩 Zayan^{Mr Bangladesh71} (Talk)

Nomination of Saheb (1981 film) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Saheb (1981 film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saheb (1981 film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

🇧🇩 Zayan^{Mr Bangladesh71} (Talk)

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Halud Foressa per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Halud Foressa. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Izno (talk) 19:58, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@BhikhariInformer, you had asked to block Anirban est, but @RavensfireRavensfire has blocked me. Plz look into the matter Ayaasho (talk) 03:24, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Might want to take a closer look at your block log. I reported your continued block evasion; you were blocked by a check-user who verified that you are evading the block. Again. And thus, WP:BANREVERT applies. Good-faith editors shouldn't need to waste their time with articles where you continue to add unsourced material, continue to make broad claims from click-bait articles, continue to be disruptive. Please just stop. Ravensfire (talk) 03:42, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Who did tell you that those are unsourced?

Do you have any knowledges about those articles? Those were reviewed and all the references were there. Some articles didn't have much info, then how can I add those?

I am not HF sock, his records tell that his editing pattern was something else for some specific articles.

I till request to unblock me and to block Anirban est, who claims himself to be a sockpuppet.

At first, go and gain knowledges about those topics, then come to nominate for deletion. Ayaasho (talk) 03:49, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Bengali film soundtracks

A tag has been placed on Category:Bengali film soundtracks indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:36, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

plz don't delete these sir, these are not harmful for wikipedia Ayaasho (talk) 03:34, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ayaasho (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I didn't have done anything harmful. @BhikhariInformer had told @Ravensfire to block Anirban est, while I have been blocked mistakenly. That Anirban est clarified him to be a sockpuppet. Please look into the matter.

Decline reason:

I have independtly confirmed the checkuser findings. I am declining your request. PhilKnight (talk) 15:39, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.