User talk:81.31.65.89

Attention:

This IP address, 81.31.65.89, is registered to FastNet International Ltd. In the event of persistent vandalism from this address, efforts may be made to contact them to report abuse. Contact information may be available in the WHOIS report.

If you are editing from this IP address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. Sometimes, in response to vandalism, you may be temporarily unable to create an account.

If you are an unregistered user operating from this address, note that it may be possible for the owner of the IP to determine who was making contributions from this address at any given time.

If you are the owner of this address responding to reports of inappropriate conduct from this address, you may find the contributions history and block log for this address helpful. Please feel free to contact any administrator who has blocked this address with questions (blocking admins will be listed in the block log).

March 2025

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Karen White case, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. See Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Biography#Gender identity. ObserveOwl (talk) 11:02, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for explaining the edit on the edit summary less inappropriately this time. ObserveOwl (talk) 11:08, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your passive aggressive refusal to admit that you were simply wrong. Next time, actually read the article you're editing then you won't make such embarrassing mistakes. 81.31.65.89 (talk) 11:12, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This is clearly contentious, instead of going for a one sided revering, please start a conversation in the talk page. You might be right, but just trying to push things through isn't going to help.

Speederzzz (Talk) (Stalk) 11:15, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

For ease I opened a talk page discussion for you: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Karen_White_case#Deadname_in_lede?

Speederzzz (Talk) (Stalk) 11:19, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Are you retarded? Wood's real name, when he committed his crimes, is a matter of public record and has been well reported in the media. The fact that you are apparently ignorant of this is not my problem. 81.31.65.89 (talk) 11:24, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You can be banned for such insults. We have ways of resolving such conflicts and you can either participate in them or stop editing. That's how the system works. I've been very kind and tried to help you as much as possible, because I think your edit might have merit. However we solve those problems through discussion, not edit warring.

Speederzzz (Talk) (Stalk) 11:26, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I note that you have no response at all to the basic point that Wood's name is a matter of public record. 81.31.65.89 (talk) 11:30, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It is not about whether or not something is public record, it is about whether they are well known/are famous under their old name. That is what you can read in the Manual of style that was send to you earlier. I am not from the UK so I cannot answer that, I can only set up the discussion and guide it in the correct way. You are attacking the one person that is trying to help you, with such an attitude you will find yourself banned pretty quickly.

Wikipedia is a slow website, the correct answer will come up eventually but it takes time and effort. We are a co-operative project, not a competitive one. The best article is the one we make together.

Speederzzz (Talk) (Stalk) 11:41, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

so you admit you don't actually know what you're talking about and have no substantive opinion to offer? Noted. Thank you. 81.31.65.89 (talk) 11:48, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes... I only reverted you because you were editwarring, something I know a lot about. You break the rules, you get hit with the rules-stick.

Speederzzz (Talk) (Stalk) 11:49, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at The Acolyte (TV series). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Speederzzz (Talk) (Stalk) 11:12, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your recent editing history at Karen White case shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. CR (how's my driving? call 0865 88318) 11:20, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. CR (how's my driving? call 0865 88318) 11:25, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:81.31.65.89 reported by User:Speederzzz (Result: ). Thank you. Speederzzz (Talk) (Stalk) 11:55, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of one month for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Daniel Case (talk) 18:16, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.