User talk:150.101.89.147

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions so far. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Here are some links to pages you may find useful:

• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• Simplified Manual of Style

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply create an account. It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:

• Create new pages and rename pages
• Edit semi-protected pages
• Upload images
• Have your own watchlist, which shows when articles you are interested in have changed

If you edit without an account, your IP address (150.101.89.147) is used to identify you instead.

We hope that you choose to become a Wikipedian and create an account. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or you can to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. We also have an intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to sign and date your talk page comments with four tildes (~~~~).

Happy editing! Bahudhara (talk) 00:16, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

This shared IP address has received multiple warnings for inappropriate edits. Since different users may be using this IP address, many of these warnings may be stale. Click [show] at far right to see all previous warnings and/or blocks.
The following is a record of previous warnings and/or blocks left for this IP. Please do not modify it.
January 2016 Hello, I'm Bahudhara. I noticed that you made a change to an article, List of people from Adelaide, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Bahudhara (talk) 00:16, 14 January 2016 (UTC) April 2017 Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Dada Maheshvarananda has been reverted. Your edit here to Dada Maheshvarananda was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://proutaftercapitalism.blogspot.com) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest). If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 01:32, 26 April 2017 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice. April 2021 Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Northern line. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards. If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. The "crimes" happening on the lines is WP:UNDUE. You certainly can add those crimes (if notable enough) to their respective station, but certainly not the line as those crimes are not affecting the whole line. SunDawn (talk) 08:28, 12 April 2021 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices. Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Peter Malinauskas. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. CommanderWaterford (talk) 09:22, 15 April 2021 (UTC) You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page. --Canley (talk) 12:07, 16 April 2021 (UTC) You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Heathrow Airport. David J Johnson (talk) 11:22, 26 April 2021 (UTC) May 2021 Hello, I'm Sumanuil. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Darwin Island have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. - Sumanuil (talk) 07:11, 23 May 2021 (UTC) July 2021 Hello, I'm Warrenjs1. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Warrenjs1 (talk) 09:00, 17 July 2021 (UTC) Please stop your disruptive editing. If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards. If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union, you may be blocked from editing. Warrenjs1 (talk) 11:26, 18 July 2021 (UTC) But this is not distruptive editing.150.101.89.147 (talk) 02:25, 23 July 2021 (UTC) August 2021 Hello, I'm Phenolla. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to War crimes by the Taliban—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. —Phenolla ⚫️🔵 04:49, 14 August 2021 (UTC) It is constructive and it belongs here. You can leave it alone.150.101.89.147 (talk) 04:50, 14 August 2021 (UTC) The place to discuss this specific edit is Talk:War crimes by the Taliban#Taliban taking over. Please see WP:EDITWAR and sort this out on the talk page rather than edit-warring. Boud (talk) 14:32, 15 August 2021 (UTC) I've already taken it there.150.101.89.147 (talk) 08:43, 16 August 2021 (UTC) Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Arthur Blackburn. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. —Phenolla ⚫️🔵 04:53, 14 August 2021 (UTC) You are the vandal!! It was a part of the British Empire150.101.89.147 (talk) 04:54, 14 August 2021 (UTC) September 2021 Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at United States Marshals Service. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards. If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. - wolf 02:19, 9 September 2021 (UTC) It is you who is very disruptive. Please leave the edit alone.150.101.89.147 (talk) 03:05, 9 September 2021 (UTC) FYI, as IP users can't be WP:PINGed, this is to notify you that there is a reply to your recent comment at Talk:United States Marshals Service#Pop culture entry. - wolf 04:02, 9 September 2021 (UTC) Following your last reply; "I must say, you also do not get to revert it just because you feel like it.", I feel I should try to clarify some things; I did not revert "just because I felt like it". As I stated, and linked in my summary, I simply took the article back to "QUO" (as in, status quo ante bellum or the stable version before the disruption. QUO is a widely accepted practice on WP. This is also the version the article should be at while this matter is deliberated, as per WP:BRD, which is another widely accepted practice. It's fairly simple, you made a Bold edit, it was Reverted, and now it gets Discussed, if necessary. The act of "B"old, "R"evert, "R"evert, "R"evert, "R"evert, etc., etc., is considered disruptive, and it's the reason we have a policy against edit warring. I clearly notified you of the policy, while trying to initiate a dialog with you, but you went and violated the policy anyway, and have shown little interest in discussion. At this point, I would encourage you to self-revert your last edit, take some time to read the information that was provided to you, then return to the article talk page and make a sincere effort to have a collegial discussion. You have yet to show how this content, as a pop culture entry, aids the reader in understanding the article's subject. For example, the first entry, the show "Justified" is about a modern day US Marshal. Though fictionalized, it gives readers an understanding of what Marshals do, as opposed to say... local law enforcement, or the DEA, Secret Service, etc. Your entry basically says: "some Marshals get on a plane with some bad guys and they all get shot and killed." As the editor seeking to add the content, the ONUS is on you to ensure the content is adequately sourced and if req'd (and yes, it's req'd here), you need to ensure there is a consensus in support of your addition (which is difficult as no one else has appeared on the talk page to join the discussion). Following that, if we can't agree that the content is relevant and beneficial to the reader, if we don't agree that there are sufficient refs in place, and there is not a consensus in support of your edit, then you should consider the dispute resolution process. These are all guidelines and/or standard practices that I have already notified you of, yet you have not followed any of them. All you have done is posted some snarky comments and violated the rules on edit warring. I've told you how you can fix the violations before there is any potential admin action (such as a block) and I'm still trying to work with you to on this. If you make an effort (on the article talk page), I'm sure we can resolve this. Have a nice day - wolf 06:56, 9 September 2021 (UTC) Edit warring You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on United States Marshals Service. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Points to note: Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; Do not edit war even if you believe you are right. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. - wolf 03:57, 9 September 2021 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices. You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on United States Marshals Service. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Points to note: Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; Do not edit war even if you believe you are right. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. As you are well aware, the content that you've added has not met consensus on **the talk page**. An occasional sentence does not qualify as a meaningful conversion. Do not edit on United States Marshals Service for _any reason_ until reaching clear consensus on this issue. I will likely be reverting to keep other editors away from WP:3RR. You'll note none of this discusses the content, which is irrelevant at this point. tedder (talk) 06:11, 10 September 2021 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices. Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. - wolf 05:33, 9 September 2021 (UTC) SAS On the Special Air Service page, I'm not completely sure why you made this edit... we are currently disputing another edit you made and now you edit to this page immediately after me. But anyway, (with agf) I started a thread at Talk:Special Air Service#Information from different venues to ask you about this edit. Thanks - wolf 08:09, 9 September 2021 (UTC) Sorry, but anyone can edit. I was not picking on you! It's sheer coincidence that I edited the same article you edited.150.101.89.147 (talk) 06:02, 10 September 2021 (UTC) September 2021 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  tedder (talk) 06:16, 10 September 2021 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in. Undid revision 1043299779 by Calton (talk) Over time, various bits of info gets added to articles. And that becomes the new status quo. You need to find a dictionary and look up the actual meaning of "status quo". --Calton | Talk 04:21, 11 September 2021 (UTC) You can start with yourself, Calton.150.101.89.147 (talk) 07:13, 19 September 2021 (UTC) Please stop First and final warning, if I catch you Edit warring or engaging in WP:TENDENTIOUS again, I will file a report against you in Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring Afroditeiraq (talk) 02:00, 19 September 2021 (UTC) I know you have good intent, but here on Wikipedia we can’t do things like this. And I apologize for how I came off earlier Afroditeiraq (talk) 02:08, 19 September 2021 (UTC) Yeah? Go ahead. File as many as you want.150.101.89.147 (talk) 07:13, 19 September 2021 (UTC) May 2022 Hello, I'm Tysska. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, HM Prison Belmarsh, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Tysska (talk) 06:25, 20 May 2022 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices. December 2022 Hello, I'm Mako001. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Human rights in the Middle East, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 05:25, 17 December 2022 (UTC) Please do not add or change content, as you did at Human rights in the Middle East, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. YouTube is not a reliable source. LilianaUwU (talk / contribs) 05:28, 17 December 2022 (UTC) Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Griffin (disambiguation). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards. If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 08:03, 18 December 2022 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Block evasion

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 23:48, 18 December 2022 (UTC)

March 2023

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Visa policy of the United Arab Emirates, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 06:36, 4 March 2023 (UTC)

Hello, I'm DarkAudit. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Leslie Carter—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. DarkAudit (talk) 08:22, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

---