User talk:राजकुमार

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

― "Ghost of Dan Gurney" (talk)  17:22, 19 October 2024 (UTC)

October 2024

I am allowed to be bold when removing content that violates NPOV, and I am allowed to revert edits which flagrantly misappropriate sources without discussion. You should read WP:ONUS and be mindful when reverting edits in the India-Pakistan-Afghanistan topic area. ― "Ghost of Dan Gurney" (talk)  18:53, 19 October 2024 (UTC)

I am allowed to revert any edit that appears biased toward a specific subject. राजकुमार^(talk) 03:18, 20 October 2024 (UTC)

You are expected to assume good faith of your fellow editors. Calling edits vandalism which are not vandalism, which you did here is disruptive and raises the temperature of any subsequent discussion. Additionally, restoring the word "terrorist" violates NPOV yet again. ― "Ghost of Dan Gurney" (talk)  13:32, 22 October 2024 (UTC)

April 2025

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that your recent edit to 2025 Pahalgam attack did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account, you can give yourself a reminder by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary (or the default undo summary), and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! Celjski Grad (talk) 10:07, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contribution(s). However, as a general rule, while user talk pages permit a small degree of generalisation, other talk pages such as Talk:2025 Pahalgam attack are strictly for discussing improvements to their associated main pages, and many of them have special instructions on the top. They are not a general discussion forum about the article's topic or any other topic. If you have questions or ideas and are not sure where to post them, consider asking at the Teahouse. Thanks. GrabUp - Talk 13:03, 24 April 2025 (UTC)

2025 Pahalgam attack

Please stop reverting my changes at 2025 Pahalgam attack. If you wish to make edits then do so without reverting previous changes. Please see Help:Editing. Celjski Grad (talk) Celjski Grad (talk) 10:13, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

@Celjski Grad, What’s your deal? Are you deliberately sabotaging this article? I already explained it was blanked by mistake. What’s wrong with my edit that you keep reverting it over and over? There’s no rule forcing new users to add a description, so why are you acting like there is? You’re just hijacking the entire article, undoing new users’ edits without even bothering to check if they’re wrong. Stop it! राजकुमार^(talk) 10:37, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

My deal is that you keep reverting all of the changes I made before your edit. Please read Help:Edit conflict. Re-add your edits without reverting my previous changes.

And yes, edits should be explained. Celjski Grad (talk) 10:43, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

@Celjski Grad, Oh thrn it's my fault. I'm extremely sorry राजकुमार^(talk) 10:47, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

No worries, and thanks for editing! Celjski Grad (talk) 10:48, 23 April 2025 (UTC)