User:SusieCCameron/elcornoemplumado/Bibliography

You will be compiling your bibliography and creating an outline of the changes you will make in this sandbox.

Bibliography

As you gather the sources for your Wikipedia contribution, think about the following:

Is the source from a reliable publication?
- Reliable publications include established newspapers, academic journals and books, textbooks, and other published sources with reputations for accuracy and fact-checking.
- Unreliable sources include blog posts and other self-published works, press releases, and social media posts.
Is the source verifiable?
- In order for a source to be considered verifiable, other editors should be able to consult the source.
Is the source independent of the subject?
- Is the source connected in any way to the subject? This is especially important when writing biographies or about organizations.
- For example, if you were writing a biography, sources like the person's webpage or personal blog would not be considered independent.
Is the source primary or secondary?
- Primary sources include first-hand accounts, autobiographies, and other original content.
- Wikipedia allows limited use of primary sources, but typically only for straightforward, descriptive statements of facts, and only if they are published and verifiable without requiring specialized knowledge.
- Secondary sources should be the main basis for a biography on Wikipedia.
If you're working on a topic related to medicine or psychology, ensure that your sources follow these special guidelines.
If you're creating a new article, consider the following:
- Ensure that your topic meets Wikipedia's notability guidelines.
- In order for a topic to meet the notability requirement, you must be able to identify 2-3 sources that are reliable, verifiable, and independent of the subject you're writing about.
- Finding sufficient sources to establish notability can be especially hard when writing about people or organizations.
- Sources that are not independent of the subject might be useful additions, but don't count towards the notability requirement.
- Wikipedia has developed special guidelines for writing about living persons. Please follow these carefully.
- Wikipedia has a series of guidelines for writing about different categories of people, such as academics and artists. If you're trying to create a new entry about a living person, please look at these carefully.

If you're not sure whether a source is reliable, ask a librarian! If you have questions about Wikipedia's sourcing rules, you can use the Get Help button below to contact your Wikipedia Expert.

Get Help

Bibliography

Agustín, José. 1996. La contracultura en México: la historia y el significado de los rebeldes sin causa, los jipitecas, los punks y las bandas. José Agustín. Mexico City: Penguin Random House Grupo.
Allen, Gwen. 2011. Artists' Magazines: An Alternative Space for Art. Cambridge: MIT Press.
- This is a peer-reviewed book from a university press, so it should be a reliable source. It gives an overview of El Corno Emplumado lists artists whose work was featured in it, so it is helpful in establishing notability.

Carey, Elaine. 2005. Plaza of Sacrifices: Gender, Power and Terror in 1968 Mexico. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.
- This is a book was published by a university press, so it should be reliable for important historical background. It doesn't directly mention El Corno Emplumado, so it can't be used to establish notability.
Doherty, Taylor Marie. 2024. “‘Contact is Community’:A Conversation with Margaret Randall,” Middle Atlantic Review of Latin American Studies 8 (1): 147-185. https://openurl.ebsco.com/EPDB%3Agcd%3A16%3A6038368/detailv2?sid=ebsco%3Aplink%3Aresult-item&id=ebsco%3Adoi%3A10.23870%2Fmarlas.458&bquery=Contact%20is%20Community%E2%80%99%3AA%20Conversation%20with%20Margaret%20Randall&page=1&link_origin=www.ebsco.com
- This is an article from a scholarly, peer-reviewed journal, so it should be a reliable source. It is an interview with one of the editors of El Corno Emplumado, so it can't be used to establish notability because it isn't independent of the subject.
Domenech Hernández, Grethel. 2021. “La Revista El Corno Emplumado (1962-1969), Un Latido a la Mitad del Mundo”. Caderno De Letras (39): 303-320. https://doi.org/10.15210/cdl.v0i39.20179.
- This article is from a peer-reviewed academic journal, so it should be a reliable source. The entire article analyzes El Corno Emplumado, its content and global effects, so it is helpful in establishing notability.
Domenech Hernández, Grethel. 2020. “Por una nueva solidaridad: El Corno Emplumado y la conformación de una red de fraternidad intelectual (1962-1969).” Secuencia (108): 1-29. https://doi.org/10.18234/secuencia.v0i108.1830. https://doi.org/10.18234/secuencia.v0i108.1830.
- This article was published in a peer-reviewed academic journal, so it should be a reliable source. The article analyzes El Corno Emplumado in depth, so it is helpful in establishing notability.
Koss, Zane. 2024. "Margaret Randall and Transnational Domestic Space: Translating George Bowering in El Corno Emplumado." Canadian Literature (256): 80-102. https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/margaret-randa.
- This is a peer-reviewed academic journal, so it should be a reliable source. It covers the topic in some depth, so it's helpful in establishing notability.
Mukhopadhyay, Tirtha Prasad and Zárate-Flores, Alfredo. 2022. “Octavio Paz Meets Malay Roychoudhury: The History of El Corno Emplumado and the Evolution of Poetics.” Rupkatha Journal 14 (3), 1-11. https://openurl.ebsco.com/EPDB%3Agcd%3A16%3A29375856/detailv2sid=ebsco%3Aebsco.com%3Asearch&id=ebsco%3Adoi%3A10.21659%2Frupkatha.v14n3.02&bquery=Mukhopadhyay%2C%20Tirtha%20Prasad%20and%20Z%C3%A1rateFlores%2C%20Alfredo.%202022.%20%E2%80%9COctavio%20Paz%20Meets%20Malay%20%20Roychoudhury%3A%20The%20History%20of%20El%20Corno%20Em&page=1&link_origin=www.ebsco.com
- This is a peer-reviewed academic journal, so it should be a reliable source. It covers the topic in some depth, so it's helpful in establishing notability.
Rojas, Yasmín. 2022. “The Plumed Horn / El Corno Emplumado: Poetry, Translation and Subversion.” Latin American Literary Review 49 (98): 13–20.
- This is a peer-reviewed academic journal, so it should be a reliable source. It covers the topic in some depth, so it's helpful in establishing notability.
Silva Ibargüen, Gabriela. 2017. Texto, Contexto E Índices De El Corno Emplumado. PhD diss., El Colegio de San Luis, A.C.
- This source is a dissertation. It is not peer-reviewed, so it may be less reliable of a source. But it covers El Corno Emplumado in depth, so it is helpful in establishing notability.
Zolov, Eric. 2014. “Introduction: Latin America in the Global Sixties.” The Americas 70 (3):349–62. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43189190
- This is a peer-reviewed academic journal, so it should be a reliable source. It gives important historical and social context for the topic, but it doesn't directly mention the topic, so it can't be used to establish notability.
Zolov, Eric. 2021. Refried Elvis the Rise of the Mexican Counterculture. Berkeley: University of California Press.
- This is a book published by a university press, so it should be a reliable source for providing historical context. It doesn't directly discuss El Corno Emplumado, so it can't be used to establish notability.

References

Outline of proposed changes

Click on the edit button to draft your outline.

Now that you have compiled a bibliography, it's time to plan out how you'll improve your assigned article.

In this section, write up a concise outline of how the sources you've identified will add relevant information to your chosen article. Be sure to discuss what content gap your additions tackle and how these additions will improve the article's quality.

Consider other changes you'll make to the article, including possible deletions of irrelevant, outdated, or incorrect information, restructuring of the article to improve its readability or any other change you plan on making. This is your chance to really think about how your proposed additions will improve your chosen article and to vet your sources even further.

Note: This is not a draft. This is an outline/plan where you can think about how the sources you've identified will fill in a content gap.

Get Help