User:Squidboy85

Squidboy85

en-N	This user has a native understanding of English.

ang-2	Þes brucere understent Ænglisc geþeode gemetlice.

ar-0	هذا المستخدم ليس لديه معرفة بالعربية (أو يفهمها بصعوبة بالغة).

BS-N

This user is a native speaker of Bullshit.

Latn-N
A

This user has a native-like understanding of the Latin script.

ipa
ə

This user fully understands the International Phonetic Alphabet.

Elder-2

This user has an intermediate understanding of the Elder Futhark.

Arab-1
ع‎

This user has a basic understanding of the Arabic script.

This user

Áà

This user is against any and all anti-diacritic "conventions" on English Wikipedia.

This user is interested in linguistics.

ipa
ə

This user fully understands the International Phonetic Alphabet.

This user has never left
Planet Earth.

This user is a mammal.

This user is Catholic.

Æ æ

This user's favorite letter in the English*† alphabet is Æ.

Ξ ξ

This user's favorite letter in the Greek alphabet is Ξι .

Щ щ

This user's favorite letter in the Russian alphabet is ща.

what

Z

This user is a member of
Generation Z.

This user is alive!

This user is a citizen of Australia.

This user is of multiple ancestries.

This user is of Irish ancestry.

This user is of Italian ancestry.

This user is of Dutch ancestry.

This user is of English ancestry.

:)

This user is an optimist.

This user is an extrovert

ENFJ

This user has an ENFJ
Myers–Briggs Type Indicator

This user believes that Wikipedia is the greatest website ever created.

AU-5

This user believes that Australian English is the only real English, and will likely respond to any use of The Queen's or American English with disgust.

ʍ

This user pronounces "wh" as a voiceless labial–velar fricative

zoöglœæ

This user is an evil præscriptivist who's goïng to make Latin your plurals.

tuff, doe, chru, tought

This user thinks English spelling reform is dumb, since we'll have to do it again anyway in a few hundred years, and besides, no writing system is telling me how to talk.

Oh shit!

This user thinks profanity does not exist. He believes that such words are the same as any other words and should be treated as such.

This user reads the works of H. P. Lovecraft.

This user knows what; 'Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn' means.

This user enjoys heavy reading, such as Shakespeare and other dead guys.

This user enjoys the works of
J. R. R. Tolkien.

This user enjoys classical music.

no-eo

This user does not like Esperanto.

This user is interested in
Germanic languages.

This user is interested in
English grammar.

whom

This user insists upon using whom wherever it is called for, and fixes the errors of whomever he sees.

You and Me

This user thinks that if you believe it is incorrect to use "you and me" as the object of a sentence, a little talk needs to be had by you and me...

couldn't've

This user believes that couldn't've would make a perfectly fine word.

Ain't

This user believes that ain't is a proper word to use in place of a contraction of a verb and a pronoun. Ain't that right?

⅒

This user knows that the phrase
"completely decimated"
is "completely improper"!

Latin Plurals: "Data is are..."

This user uses "data", "media", "memoranda", "criteria", and "agenda" as the plurals of "datum", "medium", "memorandum", "criterion", and "agendum".

Thou/Ye

This user wants to resurrect the T–V distinction in English.

man-
kind

Regarding gender, this user prefers the vernacular, not what is politically correct.

wyf-
man

This user understands grammatical gender historically preceded and is independent of natural gender.

~~they~~
he or she

This user considers the singular they to be substandard English usage.

’s

This user understands that ~~apostrophe's~~ apostrophes are for possession and contraction, not pluralization.

“…”

This user favors curly quotation marks over straight style.

;

This user knows how to use a semicolon correctly.

;

This user is addicted to semicolons; he uses them frequently.

‽

This user loves interrobangs.
Do you‽

;

This user's favorite punctuation is semicolons; he likes using them a lot.

infin¦
itive

This user chooses never to split infinitives.

"There's" with a plural subject

This user knows that "there's" with a plural subject is a pervasive grammatical error. ~~There's~~ ^{There are} too many people making this mistake. Don't be one of them.

by

The passive voice may be used by this user.

sax-en

This brooker wishes to cleanse English of needless fremd words.

en-pi

T'is galley wench's brat parleys
and scribes Pirate English.
Arrrrrrr!

~~try and~~
try to

This user tries to discourage usage of "try and".

ubiquitous ≠ widespread

This user asserts that the more common word is often not the most precise.

-ly

This user mourns the apparent death of the adverb, a loss that this user feels most serious.

than
then

This user understands the difference between using "than" and "then."

their
there
they're

This user thinks that there are too many people who don’t know that they're worse than their own children at spelling!

who's & whose

This user knows the difference between Who's and Whose and will fix all misuse on Wikipedia

ə

This user is a Grammar Nazi.

This user is interested in history.

This user is interested in
European dragons.

This user is interested in the Early Middle Ages.

This user is interested in
ancient civilizations.

This user does not support the judgment of historical figures by modern standards.

This user is interested in the
history of Europe.

This user is interested in
the history of England.

1066	This user is interested in the Norman Conquest.

This user is interested in
Ancient Mesopotamia

This user loves the Spring.

This user loves the Summer.

This user loves the Autumn.

This user loves the Winter.

This user wishes you a
Happy Australia Day.

This user remembers
ANZAC Day.

🎄

This user celebrates Christmas in the land Down Under.

🏖

Dec. 25

This users wishes you a Merry Christmas, NOT a
Happy Holidays!

Dec 25

This user's favorite holiday is Christmas.

This user is a preservationist who believes Wikipedians should avoid aggressive non-notability deletion and advocates that the notability rule be amended to specify that any subject with some historical value can merit an article. Details here.