Welcome to the SCX Playground! There are only 3 Rules here: (I) NEVER leave adults unattended, (II) Before you save-page, please omit needless and douchie words, unless they're kinda funny, and (III) No more rules.
The Wikipedia Social Capital Game: a "Mechanism Design" approach to transforming Wikipedia
Wikipedia, the World's Well of Knowledge, is under attack. Not from without, but from within. The object of this game is to protect Wikipedia from ourselves, for the immediate and ultimate gain of the game's Most Valuable Player: The Reader.
Please Edit as you please, and help us invent this game. Thank you.
The Projects: wiki-based projects run by the Wikimedia Foundation (a nonprofit founded in San Francisco in 2003). The Foundation operates many free-software and free-content projects.
Game objectives: Institutionalize the Social Capital Market of the Wikipedia Community, with the least amount of regulation, without breaking current rules, in a way that others can replicate, for the immediate and ultimate gain of our Readers.
Premises, upon which whole arguments are built, are easier to discredit when they are stated as simply as possible, preferably in the form of equations. We state our Assumptions precisely. You might agree or disagree. But at least we should agree on what we agree or disagree.
Wikipedia = Best Game Ever!
Wikipedia = Fun. In this playground, we play games (not gaming-games, but game-games), while making Wikipedia better for our Readers.
Responsibility = Trust. When we can be held responsible for our behavior, we are more likely to play nice, and play well, with each other.
Trust > Privacy. If we must surrender some privacy to make Wikipedia trustworthy, then that's what we ought to do.
Wikipedia = War = Bad. We propose an end to "Edit Wars" and all other forms of compensatory machoism which entrench our warlike behavior.
Wikipedia = Social Capital Exchange (SCX) = Good. We had previously proposed that Wikipedians think instead of our Community as a "market" in Social Capital.
Wikipedia = Free SCX = Better. We said that this kind of market - where the "bottomline" is the Common Good - ought to be as free as it can possibly be. Unregulated, unfettered, unconstrained.
Free SCX = Free World. Our hypothesis is this: with a free social capital market at the center of the Wikipedia Community, Wikipedians can fix our pressing problems, release our power to change the world, open bigger markets for Wikipedians, and more opportunities to Live the Dream.
What's that dream again? A world where we all share our knowledge, where all knowledge is free.
This user page or section is in a state of significant expansion or restructuring. You are welcome to assist in its construction by editing it as well. If this user pagehas not been edited in several days, please remove this template. If you are the editor who added this template and you are actively editing, please be sure to replace this template with {{in use}} during the active editing session. Click on the link for template parameters to use.
This page was last edited by WOSlinker(talk | contribs) 7 months ago. (Updatetimer)
the number of times a word introduced by an edit is viewed. Each time an article is viewed, each of its words is also viewed. When a word written by editor X is viewed, X is credited with 1 PWV.
we don't need no stinkin' "metrics"
Real-time updates on data used to quantify the strengths, weaknesses, problems and opportunities above
Institutionalize the Social Capital Market of the Wikipedia Community, with the least amount of regulation, without breaking current rules, in a way that others can replicate, for the immediate and ultimate gain of our Readers.
^Priedhorsky, Reid; Chen, Jilin; Lam, Snider (Tony); Panciera, Katherine; Terveen, Loren; Austin, Shane (2007). "Creating, Destroying, and Restoring Value in Wikipedia". Proceedings of the 2007 international ACM conference on Supporting group work. Conference on Supporting Group Work. ACM Press. pp. 259–268. doi:10.1145/1316624.1316663. ISBN978-1-59593-845-9.
^Garcia-Reid, P. (2007). Examining social capital as a mechanism for improving school engagement among low income hispanic girls.Youth & Society, 39(2), 164.
^Agneessens, F., & Wittek, R. (2008). Social capital and employee well-being: Disentangling intrapersonal and interpersonal selection and influence mechanisms.Revue Française De Sociologie, 49(3), 613-637.
^Giordano, G. N., & Lindström, M. (2011). Social capital and change in psychological health over time. Social Science & Medicine (1982), 72(8), 1219.
^Moore, S., Daniel, M., Gauvin, L., & Dubé, L. (2009). Not all social capital is good capital.Health & Place, 15(4), 1071.
^Moore, S., Bockenholt, U., Daniel, M., Frohlich, K., Kestens, Y., & Richard, L. (2011). Social capital and core network ties: A validation study of individual-level social capital measures and their association with extra- and intra-neighborhood ties, and self-rated health. Health & Place, 17(2), 536.
^Kim, P. H., & Aldrich, H. E. (2005). Social capital and entrepreneurship. Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship, 1(2), 55.