Template talk:User css

Requested move 28 July 2025

It has been proposed in this section that multiple pages be renamed and moved.

A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil.

Please use {{subst:requested move}}. Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly.

Links: current log • target log • direct move

Template:User css → Template:User CSS
Template:User css-0 → Template:User CSS-0
Template:User css-1 → Template:User CSS-1
Template:User css-2 → Template:User CSS-2
Template:User css-3 → Template:User CSS-3
Template:User css-4 → Template:User CSS-4
Template:User css-5 → Template:User CSS-5
Template:User css-N → Template:User CSS-N

– See Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 July 27#User css. In short, "css" is an actual ISO language code and should not be used here, so it’s better to rename the templates to "User CSS". Uppercase is used to distinguish it from the real language in other interwikis. Perhaps it is also necessary to replace all template usages to avoid leaving a redirect. Solidest (talk) 00:24, 28 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User css-N seems to be a duplicate of User css-4: Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Template:User css-N (2nd nomination). Solidest (talk) 00:27, 28 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Question - Are these user box templates? If so, should they be discussed here at TFD, or at MFD? Robert McClenon (talk) 18:09, 29 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Sigh, I don't know. I already moved the css-N discussion to MfD, as TfD says userboxes go to MfD. But WP:RM doesn't mention either userboxes or MfD — the latter refers to deletion, not discussion or renaming, so it's hard to tell what's actually correct. It might even have been WP:RM/TR. Solidest (talk) 20:23, 29 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support moving. Better to free up the space for an ISO code even if it's unlikely it'll be used. Schützenpanzer (Talk) 23:27, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]