This template is within the scope of WikiProject Deletion, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.DeletionWikipedia:WikiProject DeletionTemplate:WikiProject DeletionDeletion
Template:Db-notice is permanently protected from editing because it is a heavily used or highly visible template. Substantial changes should first be proposed and discussed here on this page. If the proposal is uncontroversial or has been discussed and is supported by consensus, editors may use {{edit template-protected}} to notify an administrator or template editor to make the requested edit. Usually, any contributor may edit the template's documentation to add usage notes or categories.
Any contributor may edit the template's sandbox. Functionality of the template can be checked using test cases.
To help centralize discussions and keep related topics together, the talk pages of all speedy deletion ("db-name-notice") and post-deletion ("db-name-deleted") notice templates redirect here. Please specify which one(s) you're referring to in any thread you start.
At this ANI thread we had an issue where TheTechnician27 sent a G10 notice to Trade, who wasn't responsible for the content at issue, and Trade could not figure out what page was being nominated. I understand the logic behind not including the page's title in the warning: Often, G10able pages have titles that would need to be removed or revdelled. However, we do have a way to link to a page without including its title: Special:Redirect. Would there be any objection to, in {{db-attack-notice}}, changing "A page you created" to [[Special:Redirect/page/{{<includeonly>subst:</includeonly>PAGEID:{{{1}}}}}|A page you created]]? This would generate output like A page you created. Note that this link will stop working once the page is deleted, which is a good thing: See Special:Redirect/page/79982707, which uses the former page ID for User:Tamzin/deletion test but no longer works. As far as I can see, the only downside to doing this would be a very slight visibility boost to the CSD'd page, but that page will already be in CAT:CSD and any number of things that mirror it; I think the pros outweigh the cons of giving a link for the notified user to click to see which page is nominated. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (they|xe|🤷) 06:21, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
Description of suggested change: Removal of |left| and a break for better dark mode rendering Please look at the source of this message since MediaWiki formatting goof didn't let me put it down properly in the visual editor. the 🥭 man (the 🥭 talk) 14:20, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
They also break the rest of the page, so this is definitely a case of Not done: please make your requested changes to the template's sandbox first; see WP:TESTCASES. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 19:48, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done I've added just enough code for it to work as a minimum-viable product. The template should support G15. If we want to make it fancier and have a blurb like the wizard box to show up, we should have further discussion here. Sohom (talk) 00:10, 5 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Not done: please make your requested changes to the template's sandbox first; see WP:TESTCASES. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 19:48, 23 May 2025 (UTC)
Done I've added just enough code for it to work as a minimum-viable product. The template should support G15. If we want to make it fancier and have a blurb like the wizard box to show up, we should have further discussion here. Sohom (talk) 00:10, 5 August 2025 (UTC)