Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Washington Monument (Philadelphia)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 talk 21:21, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

Washington Monument (Philadelphia)

Washington Monument
Washington Monument
Converted from a redirect by Zeete (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 52 past nominations.

Zeete (talk) 20:36, 25 March 2025 (UTC).

General: Article is new enough and long enough

Policy compliance:

Hook eligibility:

  • Cited: Yes
  • Interesting: No - My favorite is the last one, but while I don't think it's so uninteresting to reject I don't find it that engaging. How do you feel about using something like "...that Philadelphia's Washington Monument (pictured) includes a man killing an alligator with a trident?" ? The alligator + trident immediately stood out to me while reading the article, though I'm not sure if "killing" is appropriate since you've got "having killed" and this may need to be rephrased. If you hate this hook or possible variants I'm willing to approve ALT2 as is or review some other ideas.
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Rusalkii (talk) 18:29, 26 March 2025 (UTC)

Thanks, Zeete (talk) 18:56, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
Works for me. Will need another reviewer to approve the hook, since I suggested it. Rusalkii (talk) 19:17, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
@Rusalkii: Hook needs an end-of-sentence citation.--Launchballer 05:54, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
@Launchballer: Reference source added. Thanks, Zeete (talk) 10:13, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
I checked the article for plagiarism concerns and found nothing beyond proper nouns which are not violations. ALT0 and ALT1 are both somewhat interesting, mentioned and cited in the article, and verified by the sources. ALT2 and ALT3 are more interesting hooks. For ALT2, a source is needed directly at the end of each sentence to support each animal in the hook, as per WP:DYKHFC. The wording of ALT3 is hard to verify, since the prose mentions "The bottom level" and "The Mississippi River fountain", whereas the hook mentions "the base of". The dissimilarity of words is likely to be challenged. Best wishes. Flibirigit (talk) 00:59, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
@Flibirigit: Thanks for your review. I've added references for ALT2 and proposed ALT3a. What do you think?
Thanks, Zeete (talk) 10:58, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Aprroving ALT0, ALT1, ALT2, ALT3a. ALT2 is now properly cited and verfied. The wording in ALT3a is an improvement, the hook is now verified. I have struck ALT3 accordingly. I see no other concerns. Ready for DYK. Flibirigit (talk) 12:35, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
@Flibirigit: Thanks! Zeete (talk) 12:39, 19 April 2025 (UTC)