Template:Did you know nominations/Tandon v. Newsom
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Rjjiii talk 00:27, 27 April 2025 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Tandon v. Newsom
- ... that the midnight shadow docket order in Tandon v. Newsom was called the most important religious free exercise decision in 30 years?
- Source: SCOTUSblog article ("Tandon steals Fulton's thunder: The most important free exercise decision since 1990")
- Reviewed:
- Comment: This is a joint nomination from SilverLocust and myself. (He wrote ALT0, and I love it.) We both have fewer than 5 previous nominations, but I'm using my own "freebie".
Created by HouseBlaster (talk) and SilverLocust (talk).
Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.
HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 01:59, 30 March 2025 (UTC).
- The rest of the hook is sourced from Josh Blackman, The "Essential" Free Exercise Clause, 44 Harv. J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 637, 743 (2021) ("shortly before midnight eastern time", "shadow docket"). Oleske's phrase, "most important free exercise decision since 1990", is also quoted in Stephen I. Vladeck, The Most-Favored Right: COVID, the Supreme Court, and the (New) Free Exercise Clause, 15 N.Y.U. J.L. & Liberty 699, 734 (2022). – JensonSL (SilverLocust) 06:58, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
Great job on this article, you two. The article has no evidence of copyvio, and seems to be in good condition. No QPQ needed. Hook checks out; well sourced and cited in-article. Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 02:04, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
