Template:Did you know nominations/Prunus cathybrownae

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 talk 23:41, 11 April 2025 (UTC)

Prunus cathybrownae

(

)

Prunus cathybrownae flower

... that the fossil plum-relative Prunus cathybrownae (pictured) was named for three different Catherines?

Source: Benedict, DeVore, & Pigg 2011 page 950 etymology section - The species epithet cathybrownae is named in honor of three generations who bear this name.

ALT1: ... that a Prunus cathybrownae (pictured) fossil was gold-coated for study? Source: Benedict, DeVore, & Pigg 2011 page 949 materials and methods section - Anther fragments from the inner whorl yielded clumps containing many very small grains. These were coated with ~20 nm of gold coating, mounted on stubs, and viewed...
Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Phedimus spurius
Comment: 5x expansion moved from draft space to live in 12 Mar 2025.

5x expanded by Kevmin (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 367 past nominations.

Kev min § 17:26, 12 March 2025 (UTC).

This article, 5x expanded on 12 March, is new enough, long enough, well-sourced, and presentable. QPQ done. No copyvio. Both hooks in article, cited, and citation checks out. I prefer ALT0. GTG. Tenpop421 (talk) 17:45, 12 March 2025 (UTC)