The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Rjjiiitalk 21:22, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
Overall: New enough, long enough. Hook fact is cited and interesting. Earwig pings the longer quotes, which is unfortunate, but they do seem to be properly attributed. QPQ is done. Looks good to go! — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:56, 22 January 2025 (UTC)