Template:Did you know nominations/Montalto Reliquary
Appearance
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Launchballer talk 02:08, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Montalto Reliquary
- ... that the Montalto Reliquary was given to his home town by Pope Sixtus IV in 1586?
- Source: Vatican Museums
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Iblis
- Comment: Sorry it's late - this is IDEAL for Good Friday to Easter Sunday
Moved to mainspace by Johnbod (talk).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 245 past nominations.
Johnbod (talk) 20:57, 15 April 2025 (UTC).
Expediting this review because I agree—please place run this somewhere during the Triduum this weekend. QPQ completed (even if it's a bit sparse, but understandably due to the problems with the nom). The images are free of copyright issues. The article is long enough and appropriately referenced. AGF on non-English references (but they all look up to snuff), including that used in fact cited for the hook. Hook is interesting enough and of appropriate length. Image is only mediocre at that small a size. Per the MOS, the all-caps inscription should be rendered in lowercase (thanks to RoySmith for informing me about that). Excellent work, Johnbod! ~ Pbritti (talk) 22:39, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
- Many thanks! No RS that I know of puts Latin inscriptions in lc (which almost doesn't exist in Latin) - I put the English one that way. Johnbod (talk) 23:43, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
- @Johnbod: Apologies for the delay in promoting this. The provided QPQ is not sufficient - please provide a full review.--Launchballer 00:53, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
- User:Launchballer, review now completed, but note please it has never been a requirement to finish an uncompleteable review before promotion. Johnbod (talk) 01:55, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
- @Johnbod: Apologies for the delay in promoting this. The provided QPQ is not sufficient - please provide a full review.--Launchballer 00:53, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
- Many thanks! No RS that I know of puts Latin inscriptions in lc (which almost doesn't exist in Latin) - I put the English one that way. Johnbod (talk) 23:43, 15 April 2025 (UTC)