The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Rjjiiitalk 23:22, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
Overall: 5x expanded from 1454[1] to 8617 characters, although current size is 8901 or so.[2] QPQ done. Article is a little dry, but I didn't notice any problems other than one Earwig nitpick; changed "numerous" to "many".[3] Hook is cited and sourced in the third paragraph of the "Excimer laser treatments" section, but I don't understand why there is so much WP:OVERCITE. My guess is because the article was expanded from an older version and this was never cleaned up. It's still presentable, but distracting. Approve ALT0 in spite of the "first" red flag, but this hook is exempt. Everything looks good to me. Viriditas (talk) 05:24, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
5x expanded from 1454[1] to 8617 characters, although current size is 8901 or so.[2] QPQ done. Article is a little dry, but I didn't notice any problems other than one Earwig nitpick; changed "numerous" to "many".[3] Hook is cited and sourced in the third paragraph of the "Excimer laser treatments" section, but I don't understand why there is so much WP:OVERCITE. My guess is because the article was expanded from an older version and this was never cleaned up. It's still presentable, but distracting. Approve ALT0 in spite of the "first" red flag, but this hook is exempt. Everything looks good to me. Viriditas (talk) 05:24, 21 April 2025 (UTC)