Template:Did you know nominations/Jarinko Chie (film)
Appearance
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Tarlby talk 03:15, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Jarinko Chie (film)
- ... that in the film Jarinko Chie, protagonist Chie Takemoto uses Osaka dialect in proportion to her level of anger?
- Source: Odell, Colin; Le Blanc, Michelle (2015) [2009]. Studio Ghibli: The Films of Hayao Miyazaki and Isao Takahata (2nd ed.). Harpenden: Kamera Books. ISBN 978-1-84344-488-6. pp. 51-52
- Reviewed:
Improved to Good Article status by Plifal (talk).
Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.
Plifal (talk) 10:04, 14 March 2025 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook eligibility:
- Cited:
- Interesting:
- Other problems:
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: The article was promoted to GA on 13 March. Since it is a GA I will skip the source spotchecks. Earwig shows no copyvio. The hook is certainly interesting, and I will AGF regarding the offline source. No QPQ is needed. Just a small reminder: the film title should also be italicized in the hook. I have fixed that for you, so no worries. Good to go! —👑PRINCE of EREBOR📜 10:21, 14 March 2025 (UTC)
@Plifal and Prince of Erebor: The hook doesn't seem to comply with WP:DYKFICTION, as it describes something a character does or has in the film. Could either of you provide an alternative or two? Nineteen Ninety-Four guy (talk) 10:41, 14 March 2025 (UTC)
- @Nineteen Ninety-Four guy: could the hook be rephrased to not focus on the fictional element, e.g. "ALT0a ... that the use of Osaka dialect in the film Jarinko Chie has been noted as being used in relation to characters' emotional states?"
- otherwise,
- ALT1 ... that during the production on the Japanese animated film Jarinko Chie, director Isao Takahata reportedly stayed overnight at a doss-house to ensure it accurately depicted the city of Osaka?
- Source: https://bijutsutecho.com/magazine/review/20374 (高畑は大阪のドヤ街に泊まりこんだという [Takahata is said to have stayed overnight in a flophouse district in Osaka.])
- maybe i could think of a different one if that isn't good enough, but this is my first time so i'm unsure what would work well.--Plifal (talk) 11:13, 14 March 2025 (UTC)
- I think ALT1 is better, as it's more situated in a real-world context than the former. But does the source explicitly use the adverb "reportedly"? Because such a word may be seen as casting doubt to an otherwise credible author or publication's claim in Wikipedia's voice; see Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Words to watch. Nineteen Ninety-Four guy (talk) 16:46, 14 March 2025 (UTC)
- the exact phrasing is '高畑は大阪のドヤ街に泊まりこんだという' which without direct attribution i decided to phrase as "reportedly" although i'm by no means an expert on translation.--Plifal (talk) 10:37, 15 March 2025 (UTC)
OK, I took a look at the English translation on Google Translate, and the adverb is totally justified. Prince Erebor's review on other areas still checks out, so I will approve ALT1 as being the most compliant and quite interesting of the hooks. Nineteen Ninety-Four guy (talk) 12:31, 15 March 2025 (UTC)
- the exact phrasing is '高畑は大阪のドヤ街に泊まりこんだという' which without direct attribution i decided to phrase as "reportedly" although i'm by no means an expert on translation.--Plifal (talk) 10:37, 15 March 2025 (UTC)
- I think ALT1 is better, as it's more situated in a real-world context than the former. But does the source explicitly use the adverb "reportedly"? Because such a word may be seen as casting doubt to an otherwise credible author or publication's claim in Wikipedia's voice; see Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Words to watch. Nineteen Ninety-Four guy (talk) 16:46, 14 March 2025 (UTC)
- maybe i could think of a different one if that isn't good enough, but this is my first time so i'm unsure what would work well.--Plifal (talk) 11:13, 14 March 2025 (UTC)