Template:Did you know nominations/J. J. Walser Jr. House
Appearance
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cielquiparle talk 18:50, 27 April 2025 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
J. J. Walser Jr. House
- ... that Chicago's deteriorating J. J. Walser Jr. House has not been repaired because it is unclear who owns the house? Source: Rodkin, Dennis (July 1, 2024). "Stuck in foreclosure limbo, Frank Lloyd Wright house in Austin needs a rescuer". Crain's Chicago Business
- ALT1: ... that the first owners of Chicago's J. J. Walser Jr. House lived there for no more than seven years, while its most recent occupant lived there for 49 years? Source: Walser, Joseph J., House (Report). National Register of Historic Places, National Park Service. April 23, 2013. p. 24; Jeffries, Ella (March 18, 2025). "Historic Frank Lloyd Wright Home Added to List of Endangered Architecture in Chicago". Smithsonian Magazine.
- ALT2: ... that a Chicago organization asked television producers for help repairing the J. J. Walser Jr. House? Source: Lynch, La Risa (February 10, 2021). "More than just a landmark". Austin Weekly News.
- ALT3: ... that a Chicago organization asked television producers for help repairing the J. J. Walser Jr. House after other attempts to repair the house failed? Source: Lynch, La Risa (February 10, 2021). "More than just a landmark". Austin Weekly News.
- Reviewed: Aquilegia hinckleyana (2nd of 2 QPQs)
5x expanded by Epicgenius (talk).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 712 past nominations.
Epicgenius (talk) 23:34, 23 March 2025 (UTC).
Interesting article about a neglected masterwork, on plenty of fine sources, offline sources accepted AGF. I like the original hook and ALT1. The image is licenced and a must imho. In case it is not taken, we should add the famous architect's name that can be concluded from the image. I wonder if File:Walser House 1.JPG would be the better image option, looking more like spring ;) - In the article, I'd say about the last owners, instead of "respective deaths", just "after they died" and follow with the deterioration. I don't think it's lead material that he died before her. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:21, 24 March 2025 (UTC)