Template:Did you know nominations/Barbeque Nation 2
Appearance
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93 talk 23:57, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Barbeque Nation
- ... that an Indian restaurant chain has over 800 combinations of kulfi flavours, toppings, and sauces?
- Source: [1]
- Reviewed:
- Comment: Previously nominated in 2012, which was rejected, and the article was eventually deleted due to its promotional tone (which is why there is a 2 in this page).
Moved to mainspace by TNM101 (talk).
Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.
TNM101 (chat) 17:38, 18 March 2025 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy compliance:
- Adequate sourcing:
- Neutral:
- Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:
Hook eligibility:
- Cited:
- Interesting:
- Other problems:
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: This is a solid and well-sourced article, TNM101. It was created in 13 March and submitted for nomination on 18 March, within the 7-day period. The hook is interesting and backed by source. Earwig shows no copyvio. QPQ not required. I spotchecked sources 6 and 9. Source 9 is fine, but source 6 (the Sydney Morning Herald article) seems to be about a restaurant in Australia, while the article states that the chain only operates in India, the UAE, Malaysia, and Oman, so I am not sure if this source is referring to the same restaurant. —👑PRINCE of EREBOR📜 09:53, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
- Oh right, that might be my mistake. I made this article in a bit of a hurry (not paid) so I think I just used the source without thinking. I'll fix that tomorrow TNM101 (chat) 18:07, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
- @TNM101: Any updates? —👑PRINCE of EREBOR📜 04:11, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
- @Prince of Erebor: Yes, sorry for the delay. I have made some changes, could you please check? TNM101 (chat) 16:48, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
No worries, TNM101. I just checked the article. The Sydney Morning Herald piece has been removed and the new source 6 checks out. I also did another round of spotchecks on sources 14 and 15 and both seem fine. I noticed a typo in the infobox and have fixed it for you. I think it is ready to go now! —👑PRINCE of EREBOR📜 17:33, 8 April 2025 (UTC)