Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Antoinette Lubaki

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 talk 17:14, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Antoinette Lubaki

  • ... that Antoinette Lubaki is considered to the first artist in Congo to create works on paper?
Created by MumphingSquirrel (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.

MumphingSquirrel (talk) 13:04, 4 January 2025 (UTC).

  • Hello I will review this. New enough and long enough. Please could you check the edits I made.

I cannot find the original and ALT1 hooks in the cite above. Re ALT2 source says 'It is said that ...." so ALT2 would have to be modified but I would still find it interesting. Would you like to suggest an ALT3 based on ALT2 or shall I? Chidgk1 (talk) 15:55, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Nice article - awaiting your response to above and my edits Chidgk1 (talk) 16:56, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Hi, thanks! would below work for an alt 3. ALT3: ... that it is said that Congo's first woman artist Antoinette Lubaki painted her watercolours by candlelight at night, as no stories were allowed to be told during daylight? Source: https://awarewomenartists.com/en/artiste/antoinette-lubaki/ MumphingSquirrel (talk) 19:50, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

That looks better - I would just like to tweak slightly to

ALT4: ... that it is said that Congo's first named woman artist Antoinette Lubaki painted her watercolours by candlelight at night, as no stories were allowed to be told during daylight?

@MumphingSquirrel: Ah I see now that the original and ALT1 hooks are supported by other cites in the article so if you prefer you could modify them. Also please could you cite or remove the 2 statements I tagged in the article. Hi, @Chidgk1: cites added. Happy to go with ALT 4

@MumphingSquirrel: Thanks for citing her other name. Sorry for being picky but I am not sure I am allowed to approve ALT4 myself as I wrote part of it, so I have asked for second reviewer to approve it. Also I am not sure that youtube vid is a reliable source - the second reviewer might also be able to comment on that. Do you know whether "KCongo Art" who made it are reliable? Chidgk1 (talk) 06:35, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Requesting second reviewer to finish off - very little more to do — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chidgk1 (talkcontribs) 06:38, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

@Chidgk1: have removed "KCongo Art" as has been made private. Was created by an arts organisation but can't check it for details now as access has disappeared. Thanks for your help! MumphingSquirrel (talk) 19:23, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Second review as per above:

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Article is new enought, long enough, has solid sourcing, is neutral and plagiarism free. ALT4 is cited and interesting. However, I don't think the image can be used (& shouldn't be on Commons - sadly) - we don't know her date of death, and even when that is absent, in the USA this source describes how in cases where year of death is unknown, its 120 years from date of creation. Ive flagged the image on Commons. If we can take the image out I think it's good to go MumphingSquirrel & Chidgk1 Lajmmoore (talk) 13:12, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

@Lajmmoore: Have removed image from article as advised. Can I leave this with you now? MumphingSquirrel (talk) 20:06, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Lajmmoore (talk) 20:20, 26 January 2025 (UTC)