The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cielquiparletalk 11:54, 4 March 2025 (UTC)
Improved to Good Article status by HadesTTW (talk), CatchMe (talk), and Locust member (talk).
Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.
HadesTTW (he/him • talk) 03:31, 4 February 2025 (UTC).
Overall: Looks good, fair use justifications look solid, interesting fact is backed by the source, and nothing concerning from Earwig. Easy pass; congrats! ThaesOfereode (talk) 12:45, 10 February 2025 (UTC)