The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93talk 10:39, 24 February 2025 (UTC)
Overall: The article is new enough, having been created on February 3, and meets the minimum length for DYK. Additionally, Earwig indicates that it is unlikely to contain copyright violations. The article, and hook, are both sourced appropriately and maintain a neutral point of view. Additionally, the hook is interesting and QPQ has been satisfied. Overall, I see no reason not to approve this submission. JJonahJackalope (talk) 19:13, 5 February 2025 (UTC)