Jump to content

Teamsters v. Lucas Flour Co.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Teamsters v. Lucas Flour Co.
Decided March 5, 1962
Full case nameLocal 174, Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America v. Lucas Flour Co.
Citations369 U.S. 95 (more)
Holding
A binding arbitration stipulation in a collective bargaining agreement constitutes a limited, implied no-strike clause over the matters subject to arbitration.
Court membership
Chief Justice
Earl Warren
Associate Justices
Hugo Black · Felix Frankfurter
William O. Douglas · Tom C. Clark
John M. Harlan II · William J. Brennan Jr.
Charles E. Whittaker · Potter Stewart
Case opinions
MajorityStewart
DissentBlack

Teamsters v. Lucas Flour Co., 369 U.S. 95 (1962), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that a binding arbitration stipulation in a collective bargaining agreement constitutes a limited, implied no-strike clause over the matters subject to arbitration. Therefore, a strike to settle a dispute subject to mandatory arbitration was unprotected.[1][2][3]

Significance

[edit]

Technically, this case was limited to an award of monetary damages to the employer for an unprotected strike. A later case, Gateway Coal Co. v. Mine Workers, extended this principle to injunctive relief.[3]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Teamsters v. Lucas Flour Co., 369 U.S. 95 (1962).
  2. ^ Wellington, Harry H. (1968). Labor and the Legal Process. pp. 112–117.
  3. ^ a b Lareau (May 2014) [2003]. Labor and Employment Law. pp. 19–11, 12.
[edit]

This article incorporates written opinion of a United States federal court. As a work of the U.S. federal government, the text is in the public domain.