Talk:Zombivli

Zombivli was a Media and drama good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
June 7, 2022	Good article nominee	Not listed
July 31, 2023	Good article nominee	Not listed
May 19, 2024	Good article nominee	Not listed
April 22, 2025	Good article nominee	Not listed
Current status: Former good article nominee

India Mid‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Film: Indian

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema task force.

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

Zombivali movie poster.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 09:37, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Title Name

Srimant_ROSHAN Sir Its titel has been create by wrong name. The original title belongs to Zombivli [1].

Bovineboy2008 Sir, attention to this articles. Cinzia007 (talk) 18:08, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have redirected the page named Zombivali to Zombivli.Srimant ROSHAN (talk) 18:43, 7 February 2022 (UTC) Srimant ROSHAN (talk) 18:44, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

😊 Cinzia007 (talk) 18:49, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Article needs major cleanup - who wants to help

Lot of grammar errors, some areas with no information, very few citations

~~Cattywampus23

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Zombivli (2022 film)/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: TompaDompa (talk · contribs) 14:37, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is a WP:QUICKFAIL based on criterion 1 (It is a long way from meeting any one of the six good article criteria). The current version is rather barebones (WP:GACR 3a: it addresses the main aspects of the topic), but more obviously it is in need of a thorough copyediting (WP:GACR 1a: the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct). Examples include But Dombivli, which, like Mumbai, still had a high case count therefore team searched for a place where the cases of COVID-19 is low in number. and Except for a few top-angle and exterior shots are filmed in Dombivli and 90% of the film has been shot in Latur. TompaDompa (talk) 14:37, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

GA Review

Unsuccessful. Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 09:48, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Zombivli/GA3. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Srimant ROSHAN (talk · contribs) 09:30, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 09:48, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sadly, this is another WP:QUICKFAIL based on criterion 1, as the issues of the previous review have not been addressed. The article is far from being [b]road in its coverage, with the "Production" and "Release" sections being lacking in content. More importantly, the prose issues are still present, with grammatically incorrect and hard-to-parse sentences such as But Dombivli, still had a high case count. Therefore Latur which was low on the list of COVID-19 positive patients. and Except for a few top-angle and exterior shots, they were filmed in Dombivli, and 90% of the film was shot in Latur., which means the article is still a long way from meeting WP:GACR 1a (the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct). Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 09:48, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

quickfailed. --Plifal (talk) 10:28, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

GA review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Zombivli/GA4. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Srimant ROSHAN (talk · contribs) 07:20, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Plifal (talk · contribs) 10:25, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

hi! i'm so sorry, but i'm quickfailing this review. i do not think this article is yet ready for the good article process. the biggest concern i have is the general lack of information. there is not enough content here to justify this article meeting certain basic editorial standards. please do not consider putting this up for review until these issues are solved, feel free to look at examples of film good articles to help you!--Plifal (talk) 10:25, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

general comments

i do not believe there is enough information in this article to properly justify this receiving good article status. if you can find sources not in the english language to help you achieve this i strongly recommend you use them. please don't feel discouraged at the outcome of this review though. i think it's very admirable that you've committed yourself to improving the encyclopaedia! standards for good article are just quite high. i recommend finding more information about the film, re-editing the article, and enlisting the help of peer reviewers and the guild of copyeditors to help you turn this article green! best of luck and happy editing!!

plot

plot summaries are generally between 400 and 700 words long. they can be shorter (though generally not longer) but reading this i only know the basic premise. however, i know nothing of the details, how the plot unfolds, the characterisation of the performances, the outcome of the story etc.

production and release

with a total of six sentences across both sections, i would almost question the need to split it up into different subsections.
"As Dombivli remained a hotspot," if you're referring to the prevalence of coronavirus in the area at the time, make that more clear since "hotspot" by itself may be interpreted differently (e.g. lots of people were in the area because it is a travelling hotspot).

reception

"Zombivli received positive reviews from critics for its unique blend of horror and social commentary." is is a statement that requires corroboration by (ideally) multiple sources; not one review from the Times of India.
""zombie apocalypse with a dash of humour"" is a quote that could quite easily be rephrased in your own words such that i have a potential copyvio concern about this.

sources

sources 4 and 5 seem to be the same. some of the sources don't have author names, many of the sources have the website https code rather than the website name. the sources in general could do with archive links and access dates on them.
the first result i found when i searched this film into google is a source that remains unused in the article: [2] is there a reason for that?

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.