Talk:Zero day

Zero Day Overview

Hi guys, as this whole article is Help:Disambiguation I wanna start a discussion about merging the content of the three current zero day articles into the parent one, which shows the zero day market and gives details about zero day attacks, viruses and warez. Checking now for details and start writing the article as an overview of the different topics within zero days, including a market overview. Please add your comments here. Thanks! --Never stop exploring (talk) 06:03, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

invited all the three article talk pages to join here for the discussion :) --Never stop exploring (talk) 06:16, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done Deku-shrub (talk) 19:42, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Zero-day (computing) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 13:05, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Zero Day (2025) TV mini series

I attempted to add the Zero Day (2025) TV mini series and linked to its IMDB page to help others understand. I was wanting to ask if any more Senior Wikipedia Editors could look at my Edit I added and fix the formatting a bit? (I'm new to Wikipedia and how it works). Thank You xuid0 Xuid0 (talk) 04:17, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

See also 'Zero time'

@ Padgriffin

I wrote under this IP: 2A02:3100:5A05:E900:DC2B:BE8C:BCB0:43F8

How come you consider this vandalism (vd)?

Don't you know that here, in this wp, there DO exist, at least, two articles beginning with 'zero time'?

Please do answer this question.

If you did'nt know this, please take the time to do this search!, BEFORE you treat something as vd.

This is the disambiguation page for "Zero day".
And if amongst "See also":

D-Day (military term).
Day Zero (disambiguation) and
Zero Hour (disambiguation)

are appropriate, why not "zero time"?

I just wasn't sure, whether to link both and didn't want to take the time to write a disamb. for "zero time".

Maybe you should look closer before you decide to lable something vd.

I, at least, feel mis-treated. Something which seldom happened in this (en) wp.

Steue (talk) 22:31, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

What you added was sloppy and didn't make any sense when added to the page. You added "zero time (as a search terme in wp)"

It's still unclear what articles you are proposing to add to the disambiguation. Are Zero Time Dilemma and the album Zero Time what you mean?

Maybe they could be added, but to me they seem different enough from "Zero Day" that their addition isn't needed. D1551D3N7 (talk) 22:43, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Steue: Could you please explain why you believe "zero time (as a search terme in wp)" in Special:Diff/1278832689 is something we should put in a disambig see also?

It's incredibly vague and not helpful to any reader, and telling a reader to put the string "zero time" in their search bar is not a expected way of linking readers to a related topic. The articles beginning with "Zero Time" (Zero Time, an album and Zero Time Dilemma, a video game) are extremely unlikely to be confused by a potential reader at this disambig page, nor do they really need an individual disambig to begin with.

I reverted your IP edit because we don't give direct, manual instructions to readers to search for a topic. Padgriffin ^{Griffin's Nest} 22:51, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@ D1551D3N7 and Padgriffin

As for 'sloppy', I agree. But I, kind of, explained already.

Yes, these two I meant.

'D-Day' and 'Zero day' have 'day' in common,

'Zero Time' and 'Zero day' have 'zero' in common.

For me that's enough that it warrants mentioning.

But my "standards" are more tolerant than the wp rules.

Padgriffin, I hope you don't mind my indenting your contrib, yust for better readability.

I do understand, that you and 'D1551D3N7' wrote at the same time.

Steue (talk) 23:22, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]