This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
This page has become somewhat of a meme on the internet, so it's worth keeping a careful eye on things. I think the current set of ideologies listed in the infobox — "Anti-Chinese Racism" and "Populism" — are both accurate, and maybe someone could delicately work in some sort of reference to its labor politics, but beware of people using inaccurate and anachronistic terms here. Garnet Moss (talk) 22:51, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
A "position" section was added to the infobox, calling the party economically "far-left" and socially "far-right." While this can certainly be argued, I think it's probably overdetermining, and in any case isn't actually substantiated by the attached source. I've marked it dubious for now, but would be in favor of removing this section. Garnet Moss (talk) 05:12, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Garnet Moss I removed the social position- now it just says "left-wing" as the source mentions, but I do think that it does undercut the white supremacist tones of the rest of the party. Do you think it should just stay as "left-wing?" HadesTTW (he/him • talk) 14:54, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Personally, I'd just take the "Position" section out altogether. It was a racially-concerned workers populist movement, the exact sort of thing that people like to squabble about being "left" or "right" wing, but really is just poorly-described by the left/right dichotomy in general. I think it's more confusing than simply stating what they believed. My 2c. Garnet Moss (talk) 19:53, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
