Talk:William Jenkins Wilcox Jr.
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Did you know nomination
[edit]
- ... that William Jenkins Wilcox Jr. was given a Citizen Archivist award at a symposium titled "Secret City in the Tennessee Hills: From Dogpatch to Nuclear Power"?
- Source: "At the September 2012 National Archives of Atlanta symposium titled¨”Secret City in the Tennessee Hills: From Dogpatch to Nuclear Power,” Bill received a Citizen Archivist award."[1]
Hawkeye7 (discuss) 19:53, 29 March 2025 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy compliance:
- Adequate sourcing:
- Neutral:
- Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:
- ?
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: Hello Hawkeye7, happy to review this nomination. The article was created on March 27, 2025. It has a readable prose size of 3521 characters. All passages in the body of the article are sourced. The article does not use promotional or overly negative language. The hook is cited and interesting. QPQ was done.
WP:EARWIG shows potential copyvios with https://oakridgetoday.com/2013/09/05/william-jenkins-wilcox-jr/ . Some of the detections are unproblematic, like the use of standard job titles. Others are borderline cases, like He spearheaded the effort to collect oral histories on the Manhattan Project, which are kept in the Oak Ridge Public Library. in our article vs He headed the effort to collect oral histories on the Manhattan Project, which are housed at the Oak Ridge Public Library. in the source. I think it concerns primarily the paragraphs starting with "After the war, he...", "Wilxcox had a heart attack...", and "In retirement, Wilcox became..". To be on the safe side, it might be best to reformulate them to make sure that the word choice and structure of the texts are not too similar.
- I have tweaked the wording in a few places to be on the safe side. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 19:44, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
A few other observations
- he never saw the calutrons there until after the war do we need to explain "calutron"? As I understand it, they are devices used to enrich uranium, but better double check.
- That is correct. Added a few words of explanation. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 19:44, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
- Wilxcox replace with "Wilcox"
- Corrected. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 19:44, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
- He was a successively a research remove the first "a"
- Deleted. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 19:44, 4 April 2025 (UTC) Phlsph7 (talk) 12:07, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
- B-Class military history articles
- B-Class military science, technology, and theory articles
- Military science, technology, and theory task force articles
- B-Class weaponry articles
- Weaponry task force articles
- B-Class North American military history articles
- North American military history task force articles
- B-Class United States military history articles
- United States military history task force articles
- B-Class World War II articles
- World War II task force articles
- Articles that have been nominated for Did you know