Talk:Washington Air Defense Sector
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Washington Air Defense Sector article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Categories
[edit]The Washington Air Defense Sector is in [[Category:SAGE sites]] and [[Category:Radar networks]]. Some other Air Defense Command sectors are listed in both these categories, but some are not. [[Category:SAGE sites]] is a subcategory of [[Category:Radar networks]]. Wikipedia:Categorization indicates that only the SAGE site category should appear. Before being bold, I thought I'd ask if there is a specific reason to retain the general radar category for Air Defense Sectors. --Lineagegeek (talk) 22:04, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia articles that use American English
- Start-Class military history articles
- Start-Class military aviation articles
- Military aviation task force articles
- Start-Class North American military history articles
- North American military history task force articles
- Start-Class United States military history articles
- United States military history task force articles
- Start-Class Cold War articles
- Cold War task force articles