Talk:Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Law Mid‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Companies

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

This article has been mentioned by a media organization:

Richard Lawler (July 10, 2022). "Twitter reportedly hires the firm that invented the 'poison pill' to sue Elon Musk". Archived from the original on July 11, 2022. Retrieved July 11, 2022.

Profits per partner

Wachtell is not the most profitable firm by profits per equity partner. That is a factually incorrect statement in the introductory blurb. I made an edit reflecting this months ago, but it was reversed. 66.44.113.139 (talk) 06:55, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WFB coverage

This page was part of an Harvard Law School edit-a-ton on 2 April, meant to add content re major cases which this firm might wish were not so widely known [1]. HLS student and Wikipedian Avachat (Lawschooltoker) made the actual edits (instead of each individual making the edits themselves), contrary to WP policy it seems (?), and further removed language describing the Gaza war protests in the United States (those at law schools eg HLS) as anti-Semitic (but they claim to have kept language noting that the firm deemed them so - have not checked). The inclusion of unsavoury major cases, and clarification re who claimed the protests were anti-Semitic, seem like sound edits that should stand.

On 14 April, the edit-a-ton was covered by Washington Free Beacon as an instance of 'anti-Semitism' [2]. There now may be/seem to be accounts/IPs reverting those edits, possibly due to the WFB coverage alone. On 17 April, Avachat made a TikTok in response, noting this trend after the WFB article [3]. (This note added on coming across Avachat's TikTok.) - Asdfjrjjj (talk) 07:15, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]