Talk:Vandalism on Wikipedia

This article was nominated for deletion on 10 January 2025. The result of the discussion was keep.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Vandalism on Wikipedia article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: Index, 1: 3 months

Wikipedia High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wikipedia, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's encyclopedic coverage of itself. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page. Please remember to avoid self-references and maintain a neutral point of view, even on topics relating to Wikipedia.WikipediaWikipedia:WikiProject WikipediaTemplate:WikiProject WikipediaWikipedia
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

ClueBot NG was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 13 July 2017 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Vandalism on Wikipedia. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

This has been mentioned by a media organization:

APRIL GLASER and WILL OREMUS (October 9, 2018). "Editing the Internet's Second Screen: How Wikipedia deals with vandals, harassers, false news, and its diversity problem".

Rm Misc?

The collection of examples seems to be more WP:TRIVIA than anything. — Alien333 (what I did & why I did it wrong) 15:01, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concur - not sure what value this section adds. Are the list items notable? Seems like we’re not adhering to WP:CSC — Safety Cap (talk) 18:18, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ClueBot NG

Should ClueBot NG's user page be linked in its section? Fairly new to editing, and haven't really done so in years. korbo (talk) 20:09, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 1 January 2025

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Change "Vandalizing Wikipedia or otherwise causing disruption is against the site's terms of use[a]." To "Vandalizing Wikipedia or otherwise causing disruption is against the site's terms of use.[a]" because move full stop before citation. 111.220.61.163 (talk) 23:51, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Done – Anne drew (talk · contribs) 01:10, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 3 January 2025

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

add Operation Orangemoody to the § See also section. 67.209.128.97 (talk) 08:49, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Done Peaceray (talk) 16:35, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

what about nothing?

Nothing has a legacy of being blanked by a bunch of people. The joke is that, its nothing. I'm not good to edit this so can someone add it to the misc section, as I think its important. It's a me a super mario (talk) 18:52, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]