Talk:Universe League
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Universe League article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 30 days ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Text and/or other creative content from this version of Universe League was copied or moved into List of Universe League contestants with this edit on 07:27, 28 January 2025. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
Issues again
[edit]Any idea on how to resolve issues regarding the page? I mean, we can't just remove information from this page as that is crucial to the survival show, and is similar to the other pages of survival shows such as Boys Planet. Paper9oll (talk · contribs), what should we do to remove those issues? PBAguila09 (talk) 06:30, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
- Welcome to Wikipedia! I noticed you may have added and/or edited some content that seems to be based on the idea that similar content exists in other articles. While it's understandable to look to other articles for examples, it's important to know that Wikipedia's content policies apply to all articles. Just because something exists elsewhere doesn't mean it's necessarily appropriate (see WP:WHATABOUT and/or WP:OTHERCONTENT). Specifically, the contents are too focused on in-universe details and assumes a familiarity with the show that a general reader won't have, violating WP:NOT and WP:EXCESSDETAIL. It needs to be rewritten to be understandable to anyone, regardless of whether they've seen the show, by summarizing key information in WP:PROSE rather than providing a comprehensive record of every intricate detail. Wikipedia articles should be accessible to a general audience, not just viewers and/or fans. — 🧧🍊 Paper9oll 🍊🧧 (🔔 • 📝) 07:10, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
- I think it is best to trim down the Overall Ranking section to ranking summary and first, second, and third elimination ranks then the rest to be removed. Putting every ranks per round is really NOT and EXCESSDETAIL. 𝙳.𝟷𝟾𝚝𝚑 (𝚃𝚊𝚕𝚔) 12:04, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
Categories:
- C-Class Korea-related articles
- Low-importance Korea-related articles
- WikiProject Korea popular culture working group
- WikiProject Korea articles
- C-Class television articles
- Low-importance television articles
- C-Class Reality television articles
- Low-importance Reality television articles
- Reality television task force articles
- WikiProject Television articles