Talk:Typhlosion/GA1

GA review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Pokelego999 (talk · contribs) 23:16, 14 March 2025 (UTC)

Reviewer: Dracophyllum (talk · contribs) 00:24, 11 April 2025 (UTC)

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV () 3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant () Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

I'll take this one. Comments to follow Dracophyllum 00:24, 11 April 2025 (UTC)

• 1a) I have basically no notes for prose, only that the ability Blaze is not mentioned in the article. Not notable I guess; I see Pikachu doesn't mention Static. Very well written and concise.
• 1b) Lede is a good summary, MOS fulfilled generally Y
• 2a) Ref layout is consistent and standard Y
• 2b) Lower quality sources acceptable for video-game article + scholarly article, RS good Y
• 2c) Spot-checking: Pass Y
  • ref 2: good
  • ref 7: good
  • ref 12: good (can be traded)
  • ref 18: good
  • ref 28: can't verify because Japanese machine translation is heinous, but gist looks good.
  • Summary of mostly positive reception is accurate, there is much defence for Typhlosion's non-canon story.
  • Bonus: https://www.academia.edu/download/81174265/le-vaillant_2020_pokefaves.pdf Lists typhlosion as a hedgehog?
• 2d) Earwig clean.
• 3a) Comparing to similar articles eg. Pikachu has similar sections and covers most needed info. Y
• 3b) Good level of detail; not Pokedex level eg.
• 4) Neutral stance on controversy, representing the facts and views accurately. Y
• 5) Very stable, despite high viewership (10k monthly) Y
• 6a) 2 non-free tagged images, at low res Y
• 6b) relevant pics of Typhlosion and variant Y

Review done @Pokelego999:. Dracophyllum 10:23, 12 April 2025 (UTC)

@Dracophyllum could you clarify what more needs to be done? I am uncertain what more needs to be accomplished before the article is passed. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 16:20, 13 April 2025 (UTC)