Talk:Trader Joe's

	; Archives (Index) ;
	2013; 2015; 2017; 2019; 2020; 2021;
	This page is archived by ClueBot III.

Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent.

'

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

California: Los Angeles Mid‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Greater Los Angeles portal This article is supported by Los Angeles area task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Food and drink Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Food and Drink task list:

To edit this page, select here

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:

Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt
Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar
Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish
Participate in project-related deletion discussions.
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food
Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section

Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:

Podcast Review of Inside Trader Joe's

Aldi connection

On the Aldi page, it says that Aldi Nord is operating "as Trader Joe's". But on this page, there is virtually no reference to Aldi, and implies that the only connection is that the previous owner also happened to be the owner of Aldi Nord.

So, what's the story? Is Trader Joe's essentially just Aldi Nord with a different name? Or something different? Stevage 02:07, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Trader Joe's is fully owned by the family of Theo Albrecht (founder of Aldi Nord), who died in 2010. And yes, it's more or less a subsidiary of Aldi Nord, with a different name. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.157.32.177 (talk) 23:26, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

TJ's is wholly owned by the Albrecht family(?) trust, along with Aldi Nord, and Aldi Sud(?) and perhaps Aldi US. While these each run independently (maybe not US which may be wholly controlled by Aldi Sud), they may cooperate on a product by product basis. They may also cooperate with other companies, including suppliers, but neither TJ's nor other companies will say so because of NDAs (Non-Disclosure Agreements) formal or informal.

TJ's is famously and habitually secretive (I do not say notorious: they are also a habitually responsible company), so independent articles are nearly always going to be: (1) original research, usually by fans of the store; (2) anecdotal; or (3) from a source that is not independent of TJ's (such as Bronco Wine Company which makes Charles Shaw).

That's just the way TJ's is, and Wikipedia cannot change TJ's policies. All we can do is write the best article we can within the primary source information TJ's allows released. TJ's might bend to a request from a Wikipedian for an interview (though I doubt it), but that would be original research, the only path to more information about TJ's. Even articles from generally reputable sources will be anecdotal, have a conflict of interest, or be some random person's original research. That's just the way TJ's is, and Wikipedia cannot change TJ's policies.

It's kind of like writing an article about the NSA or GCHQ, except TJ's has better security, and being privately owned, they have no reporting requirements as a public company would.

Maybe the solution is just to start the article with a disclaimer about TJ's secrecy, acknowledge we can't meet Wikipedia's strict source standards, and do the best we can. Whinging about the state of information about TJ's (or going off in a huff) doesn't add to the article or improve the information. The standard Wikipedia warnings are futile. TJ's has been running like this since it was bought from Joe and long past the Albrecht brothers' deaths.Laguna CA (talk) 14:48, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Verification Needed on 10 March 2025

^{[verification needed]}

I am employed by Trader Joe's and have a conflict of interest on this topic. I am hoping someone will verify the following citation, which occurs in two places in the article, as follows:

The company has been party to lawsuits seeking to have the National Labor Relations Board, which enforces U.S. labor law in relation to collective bargaining and unfair labor practices, deemed unconstitutional.[11]

In 2024, Trader Joe's joined SpaceX in a lawsuit to have the National Labor Relations Board, which enforces U.S. labor law in relation to collective bargaining and unfair labor practices, deemed unconstitutional.[11]

[11]https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2024-01-26/trader-joe-s-follows-spacex-in-arguing-nlrb-is-unconstitutional

The article in the citation says, “Trader Joe’s joined SpaceX in arguing” not “Trader Joe’s joined SpaceX in a lawsuit.”

This statement has been repeatedly shared by Trader Joe’s: “Trader Joe's has not filed or joined any lawsuit that challenges the constitutionality of the NLRB's administrative law judge system or that seeks to dismantle any aspect of the NLRB. And, Trader Joe's has no intention of filing or joining any such lawsuit.”

Here are two additional citations to consider: “After Trader Joe’s workers filed for a union election in Chicago, the grocer’s general counsel Kathryn Cahan emphasized the company had not filed or joined a lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of the labor board.” https://www.chicagotribune.com/2024/07/25/portillos-argues-that-nlrb-is-unconstitutional-in-labor-board-filings/

“Three other companies — Starbucks, Amazon and Trader Joe’s — have raised similar arguments in cases still before the NLRB’s administrative law judges, although they have not taken the case to federal court as SpaceX has done and have not joined its suit.” https://www.cnn.com/2024/04/23/business/starbucks-nlrb-supreme-court-labor-unions/index.html

TraderJoesOffice (talk) 21:51, 11 March 2025 (UTC) (The above requested verification was made by clicking on a link in an automatically added notice.)[reply]

Looks like this request was completed today by RandomMainstream. pillowcrow 17:51, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Archives (Index)
2013 2015 2017 2019 2020 2021
This page is archived by ClueBot III.