Talk:This is Gavin Newsom

This is Gavin Newsom was nominated as a Media and drama good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (April 12, 2025, reviewed version). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
	This article was accepted from this draft on 16 March 2025 by reviewer Liance (talk · contribs).

Podcasting Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Podcasting, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of notable podcasts and podcast-related information on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PodcastingWikipedia:WikiProject PodcastingTemplate:WikiProject Podcastingpodcasting
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA review

Unsuccessful. DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 15:55, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:This is Gavin Newsom/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Editorthatedits (talk · contribs) 00:05, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk · contribs) 04:19, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! I will be reviewing this! Well done on your work so far - I am not into political podcasts, especially right-learning ones, but thought this seemed interesting and thought I would review it. Well done on your work so far! I have checked earwig and there are no copyright issues. From a first reading I have the following comments:

1.) The websites/newspapers of the sources (e.g. Newsweek, Los Angeles Times, iHeartMedia etc) aren't linked - can you please link these?

2.) Please see MOS:CURLY - can you please fix the apostrophes to the correct one (')?

3.) Background:

A.) Link Democratic Party

B.) "I think with this podcast, and having the opportunity to dialogue with people I disagree with, it’s an opportunity to try to find common ground," Newsom said" - Can this please be reworded without a quote? (e.g. "Newsom believed that the podcast had the opportunity...")

4.) Episodes - this should come before Reception

5.) Episodes - can you please include brief summaries of the episodes (e.g. the guests, what was discussed and any other significant content?)

6.) Reception: A.) "Newsom has been praised by some for his venture into podcasting" - Praised by who?

B.) "Newsom said to Kirk: "I think it's an issue of fairness, I completely agree with you on that. It is an issue of fairness, it's deeply unfair."" - I think this is quite out of place - can this be fixed?

C.) Can you try to paraphrase some of the quotes in the reception section?

D.) Some of the sentences do not seem like reception and I think could be cut or moved. Also, some of them do not sound very neutral.

7.) To meet the GA criteria, the article could do with 1 or 2 extra free images.

8.) I used the IABOT to archive some of the sources - if you could archive the rest, that would be great :)

9.) Can the "Background" section be expanded with more sources and behind the scenes info? It would strengthen the article.

Once these have been addressed, I will let you know if there is anything else. Please let me know if you have any questions! DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 04:19, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thanks for the thoughtful comment and feedback! I will take your suggestions right now, but I will take most of them tomorrow or the day after. I will notify you once this is complete. Editorthatedits (talk) 04:39, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome! Please take your time, there is no rush. DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 04:43, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Editing this right now, which sentences seemed biased? I just updated it but I'm not finished. Editorthatedits (talk) 00:59, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Also, iHeartMedia is listed and I never mentioned the LA Times in the article. Editorthatedits (talk) 01:00, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@DaniloDaysOfOurLives: This nomination was created by a person that is now globally locked. (CC) Tbhotch^™ 06:23, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
In that case, I will close the nomination, but someone else can nominate it for GA in the future if they want to work on it. DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 15:55, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.