This article is within the scope of WikiProject The Simpsons, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to The Simpsons on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.The SimpsonsWikipedia:WikiProject The SimpsonsTemplate:WikiProject The SimpsonsThe Simpsons
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.
To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList
I was looking at the references and it seems to be mainly "Richmond". This seems to be a reference to The Simpsons: A Complete Guide to Our Favorite Family, because Ray Richmond was the editor of that book. This is cool but can we put the proper reference format for books (I think its something like this Ritter, R. (2002). The Oxford Style Manual. Oxford University Press.) This needs to be addressed especially since its an FA nominee --Simpsons fan 6622:56, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The current format is fine, its what's encouraged. The full format is included at the top of the references section. Also, despite being listed as the editor, Richmond is definitly the author of the book, it just means he edited the info from the episodes together into a book. Gran207:19, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Recently I've been looking for the Standard edition box set of Season 6. From what I've been told, the standard edition is out of print. Should we put this on the page or should we attempt to find proof of this? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Firebomb 87 (talk • contribs) 04:44, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I added a link to a Season 6 DVD page - [1] with lots of information. It appears to be removed as "link to fan site"? What kind of reason is this for removal? It's certainly a more valid link that the BBC guide page (they don't even air the show any more). I thought the point of links was to provide more information on a topic, beyong the scope of Wikipedia? (In which case, the official guide and tv.com links are useless, too). 87.114.171.50 (talk) 21:13, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I don't see anything in there on fansites, unless they come under "personal web pages". (Fan sites, by the way, are linked liberally throughout WP.) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.114.171.50 (talk) 23:53, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
