Talk:The Medway Poets
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article contains broken links to one or more target anchors:
The anchors may have been removed, renamed, or are no longer valid. Please fix them by following the link above, checking the page history of the target pages, or updating the links. Remove this template after the problem is fixed | Report an error |
Anthologies
[edit]Does anybody associated with the Medway Poets have details of any more group anthologies?
Tyrenius 04:20, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
Dear Tyrenius
There was never a full size anthology of the Medway Poets although I attempted to bring out a publiciation called "Fracture Clinic" back in the early 1980's which had contributions from all the Medway Poets and friends but this is very rare and I don't even have a copy myself. Bill Lewis
A response to criticisms of the Medway Poets and Remodernism
[edit]As a member of the Medway Poets I am distressed to hear that we are referred to as "Anti-intellectual". This is just not true.
I think a poem that I wrote a few years ago called "Shadow Warrior" may have contributed to this misunderstanding. Anyone that knows my work is aware that I am very interested in the Jungian concept of the shadow. In the 80's I wrote several poems exploring this. "Shadow Warrior" was the only of those poems that I allowed my personal shadow to write. I wanted to explore why ordinary people commit acts of violence and terrorism and in this poem my shadow vents its anger on the academic establishment. I want to make it clear, however, that it was my shadow and not myself that expressed these feelings. I had thought that I had made this clear by using the title "Shadow Warrior" but apparantly I did not. I set the poem out below and you can judge for yourselves.
This criticism of anti-intellectualism has not only been levelled at The Medway Poets but also at Stuckism and Remodernism. If I may just add my thoughts on this: Remodernism is about going back to the beginings of Modernism and starting again. All established intellectualism derives from the Newtonian Cartesian paradigm. I and many other Remodernists believe a new paradigm is emerging informed by quantum mechanics. For further information on this you should check out the works of Matthew Fox, Fritjof Capra, and Diarmuid O'Murchu. We are a different kind of intellectual, I have referred to it in one of my books as an "intellect of the heart".
Finally, I am not saying that everybody in Remodernism is or isn't an intellectual but in a movement which has thousands of members (100 groups worldwide) it would be wrong to make blanket statements. Bill Lewis
- Thanks for your response. I have deleted the poem, as it is copyright material which Wiki cannot use (unless you release it under a free licence of some kind); it is still in the history, however. I have moved the "Criticism" text here:
- The group has been criticised for "anti-intellectualism".[1]
- The group has been criticised for "anti-intellectualism".[1]
- At the moment it does stand out in isolation and is not balanced. I was hoping this section could be expanded with more info. If you can help to expand it, please do, citing references. As The Medway Poets existed pre-internet, it is harder to find information on them.
- There is also a separate article on Remodernism.