Jump to content

Talk:The Last Word with Lawrence O'Donnell

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article should not be only a criticism section

[edit]

The criticism section is longer than the summary, and is the only text block on the page. That really shouldn't be the case for an article which is not "Criticism of The Last Word with Lawrence O'Donnell" or similar. The article should be expanded and/or the criticism section should be shrunk. The article as it currently stands appears at the very least to be unprofessional, and can be construed as being POV —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.96.195.168 (talk) 04:56, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I agree completely. I will work toward fixing this article. Myownworst (talk) 21:32, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The criticisms seem to be quite trivial so I removed them as undue weight. Generally speaking criticism sections do not belong on Wikipedia. This section was, as long as it existed, a copybook example of why. --TS 12:23, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. In an article about someone who is a little controversial, such sections attract huge amounts of this trivial crap. That's not to say that major criticisms should not be incorporated into the remainder of the article, but not in a separate section. Cresix (talk) 16:13, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

added a link to the official "last word" site, is that ok ? it wasnt there before — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1234456556BK (talkcontribs)

It's okay. In fact, I think it makes a lot of sense. I dream of horses (T) @ 22:57, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Confused on premiere date

[edit]

It's listed as premiering sometime in September 2010 but that's months before Olbermann departed the timeslot, and doesn't line up with Olbermann's suspension.--Mobtown Mongrel (talk) 13:24, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

O'Donnell's program began in September before Olbermann departed, but at a different time. When Olbemann left, the program was moved to the previous Countdown time slot. No inaccuracy. Cresix (talk) 15:58, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What was the original timeslot? I think it should be added to the article for clarification/completeness.--Mobtown Mongrel (talk) 01:17, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The original timeslot was 10:00 p.m. But I don't think that particular detail is necessary, although I will not remove it if it is added. Cresix (talk) 01:24, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]